• No_Bet_4427@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem isn’t that the NFL is fixed.

    It’s that the rules are so subjectively and imperfectly applied that there’s no way to prove it’s not fixed.

    The NFL should add an instantaneous sky judge, make the officials full time, and add more officials to the field so that more stuff gets seen in real time. The costs are minimal compared to players’ salaries.

    Oh, and while they are at it:

    1. Make intentional grounding a real penalty by penalizing 5 yards plus the spot of the foul and loss of down. As is, there’s no real penalty: it gets called maybe 30% of the time, and when called is no worse than a sack;

    2. Fix RTP to get rid of the ridiculous “body weight” and ticky-tacky calls. Let the defense play defense.

    3. Revise the pass interference rules to get rid of gimme calls on under thrown balls where the receiver initiates contact with the DB and tried to go through the DB to get the ball. Pass interference should require the DB to be the primary initiator of contact.

    4. Don’t make defensive holding an automatic first down. Ticky tacky calls on 3rd and forever shouldn’t be an automatic first.

  • mkvii1989@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can simultaneously have atrocious officiating AND not blame it for McDermott pissing away yet another historic Josh Allen performance in a close game. I wish I could dig through the comment history of all the Bills haters in here because I’m sure the hypocrisy is strong with them.

    I’d also say that any smart player is going to gamble on taking a penalty in some situations, so I’m certain Slay knew he could either take a risk on DPI or be almost certain Diggs catches that pass for a long first down. It was a smart play on his part.

  • hairysonorth@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I got stuck with browns/broncos and raider chiefs. How controversial was the reffing in this game? Or was it your usual “team with lots of wins always gets ref help”?

    • joshallenismygod@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m gonna get downvoted by angry Philly cheese steak people but it was an absolute shit show. Pretty much WWE. It was so bad dolphins fans our division rivals were calling out the bad Reffing. That officiating crew is statistically biased towards the eagles and somehow the league doesn’t see an issue with this.

    • Phightins4044@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bills got away with alot less penalties then they should’ve got. Set the record for 1st quarter penalties this season with some of the most braindead penalties I’ve ever seen. Eagles were in their head. They were jumping offsides and tackling before the ball was even snapped. A face mask off the ball in punt protect. And a DT that should’ve been ejected but instead was allowed to commit 7 dirty plays.

    • Infinite_Mind7894@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The latter for sure. The Bills were up deep into the 4th and choked. That’s all that happened. The penalties that are being complained about happened earlier in the game. Buffalo benefits from a non-call on their last TD of the game when an online man (think it was the vent, maybe right guard) was 4 yards different blocking at the goal line. But no one’s bringing that up.

      It’s overblown noise like most ref complaints.

      • Agreeable_Employ_951@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is penalties absolutely neutered a historically awful first half form the Eagles which kept the game way closer than it should’ve been.

        • Infinite_Mind7894@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good teams overcome penalties. That’s what makes them good teams.

          The Bills were up late in the 4th and choked. That’s all there is to it. They had every opportunity to score more points (while still leading) with numerous drives unaffected by penalties but they didn’t because they couldn’t, not because their scores were being taken off the board by penalties. Those are the facts.

    • Kara_Del_Rey@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t stand the Bills but they got shafted all game. Eagles were constantly false starting (especially Lane Johnson), Allen was flagged for getting horse collared somehow, Eagles O Line getting away with some very massive holds, and more. Definitely was a suspicious game.

      • PetalumaPegleg@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another example where people don’t know the rules for tackles. Every game.

        Not calling holds is multiple times a time for both teams in every game. Carter gets held constantly.

        Allen was flagged for getting horse collared? Again I assume you don’t know the rules. He was drafted down by the front. Not a horse collar. The brief hold on the back was not how he was brought down. It was a sack and while well in the grasp Allen threw the ball away and it was grounding.

        Very suspicious. 🤪

    • thenightman4211@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The eagles fans in the sub will have you think it wasn’t an issue because they got the calls all year. Of course missed calls both ways and at the end of the day the bills lost that game themselves. But if their franchise QB was penalized on a play he was blatantly horse collared on, they would be upset to. According to the all 22, they feel vindicated so good for them.

  • LiterallyAWorm@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like the officiating in this game is blown out of proportion. The horse collar non-call was atrocious, no excuse to miss that one obviously. But for the Bills, this pass interference seems to be the only notable miss otherwise, and the play wound up being inconsequential as the Bills converted the first the very next play, farther up than the spot of the foul.

    I don’t see this game as anywhere near the dolphins game, where it was just blatantly one sided.

    • willi1221@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If everyone on that team is anything, they are accountable for their actions. Just like Bradberry admitting he held in the SB after the game. What do you want Slay to do, go tell the ref to call a flag on him?

  • Lifesaboxofgardens@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Refs miss calls all the time… nobody perfect. But holding an grabbing goes on every play. If they would’ve called it I wouldn’t be mad at all!

    Full tweet. Basically what we all know, there could be a flag on every play.

    • notPatrickClaybon@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Amazing how it’s totally fine for you in this case lol do you not see how favored you’ve been this year or are you gonna pretend it’s not happening?

      • willi1221@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not gonna say we haven’t benefited from shitty officiating. But the shit happens every year, and it’s highlighted when it benefits the top teams, ESPECIALLY when two top teams are playing each other because everybody and their mom is watching. We all have learned to deal with it, whether it’s Tom Brady, the Chiefs, and currently the Eagles benefiting from penalties.

        People have complained about the Eagles benefiting this year, but gave us shit after the SB for complaining about the holding on Bradberry to end the game. In the end, excuses are excuses, and everyone has them.

        Both teams had a chance to put the game away, and the refs had nothing to do with each team’s final play in OT

        • SharxSharxSharx@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not gonna say we haven’t benefited from bad officiating.

          People have complained about the Eagles benefiting this year, but gave us grief after the SB for complaining about the holding on Bradberry to end the game.

          SHOCKER: People don’t like it when one team is constantly benefited by bad reffing. People also don’t like it when fans of that team complain about a CORRECT call just because they didn’t like the timing of it.

      • Background-Cress9165@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eagles had a great whistle (as in, in their favor) in the bills game. There have also been games theyve had a bad one. That’s literally every team.

        The only exception i can think of is the chiefs, and thats only bc it seems mahomes gets a key call in crunch time in every game i watch theyre in. I dont watch every game, and they also beat the eagles in the sb, so could be both wrong and salty given biases.

      • Liimbo@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, I think it depends on the rule specifically. There are certain blatantly objective things like lining up past the line of scrimmage, and there are plenty of calls where I do think the refs should have some leeway to interpret such as pass interference.

      • craicraimeis@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No sport will ever be perfectly objective. I think soccer is maybe the only one we can say can really minimize the impact of a ref but even that’s BS.

        There needs to be some level of consistency between each ref crew but to think refereeing will ever be completely objective is unrealistic.

        • AutisticNipples@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Baseball definitely the closest, a balk is probably the only call that can’t be made objectively, but it’s such a minor thing anyway.

          • Wretched_Shirkaday@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s still a lot of rules in baseball that the written definition of what is and isn’t rule breaking is left up to the umps judgement. Check swings, turning to second after reaching first, etc. Soccer has a lot less rules and they’re less subjective. Plus MLB umps can just do whatever they want without repercussion.

            • AutisticNipples@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Agreed, but I think those things are easier to “make objective” in the rulebook than say determining what constitutes a legal/illegal tackle, what behavior deserves a yellow card, etc.

              It’s hard to officiate what one person is doing, but when you bring physical contact with another person into the mix, i feel like the complexity increases exponentially .

      • Suddenly_Something@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re tied for last in the league in both offensive holding and defensive holding.

        4 offensive holding calls and 2 defensive holding. If you’re curious, Dallas has 14 of each.

        • AutisticNipples@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          lmao citing Dallas in comparison is a liiiitle misleading given that they are literally most penalized team in the league for defensive holding, and tied for second most in offensive holding.

          The league average for defensive holding this season is 4, compared to the eagles 2. The league average for offensive holding calls is 8, compared to the eagles 4.

  • DrewB2400@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m just happy that some people are finally admitting that it wasn’t a horse collar tackle. Maybe a Bills fan will eventually do the same.

    • butterybuns420@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who’s “admitting it wasn’t a horse collar”? This article doesn’t and NFL network radio hosts all day yesterday and today even their “expert” Dean Blandino said it absolutely was a horse collar and should’ve been flagged.

    • Kara_Del_Rey@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait. I know Eagles fans are biased, but you’re unironically trying to say that wasn’t a horse collar? It was blatant. Not even the frontal grab, he got him on the back too.

      • dedriuslol@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah idk where “people are finally agreeing it wasn’t a horse collar” is coming from lol. After the jersey pull, he clearly grabs Allen by the back of the shoulder pads and pulls him to the ground that way.

      • ThisHatRightHere@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The frontal grab where the shirt was torn specifically couldn’t be a horse collar tackle by how the rules define it. The pull on the back is the only spot where it could be argued.

        • longshot201@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The rule word for word from the NFL:

          “No player shall grab the inside collar of the back or the side of the shoulder pads or jersey, or grab the jersey at the name plate or above, and pull the runner toward the ground. This does not apply to a runner who is in the tackle box or to a quarterback who is in the pocket.

          Note: It is not necessary for a player to pull the runner completely to the ground in order for the act to be illegal. If his knees are buckled by the action, it is a foul, even if the runner is not pulled completely to the ground.”

          1. His hand was 100% above the name plate on the back. You can make a case he didn’t have much of a grip on it, but you can’t deny that his hand was there as he’s pulling down Allen which seems to fall under this rule IMO.

          2. The word “side” is pretty ambiguous which is where this is hard to determine if the grab on the front is a classic horse collar. You can absolutely make a case that the front of the jersey is the side, or it’s not the side and I’d listen. Personally it think it’s clear that at least some part of the side of his jersey was grabbed, but the fronts not covered so this falls into a subjective area. The NFL should really clear this up in the rule book and call out if the front office the collar has the same rule as the side or back.

          3. If you look back, he 1000000% grabs Allen’s facemask as he’s got his jersey. Stop it right when he first grabs the jersey, you can’t miss it. This at least should have been a facemask if the horse collar isn’t your flavor.

          I’d be fine with the no call due to subjectivity and the ref being on the other side of the play and not seeing the grab of the back nameplate or facemask. My issue is the intentional grounding was also a subjective call, and one that tends to be pretty lenient for QBs.

          Again, all of this doesn’t matter if the Cook doesn’t drop that pass that’s probably a TD or Bass shitting the bed. Also 5 or 6 of the Bills penalties were dumb penalties that Philly didn’t really commit and were procedural that didn’t have subjectivity. But the rest were post snap and called. What grinds my gears was that the only “subjective” calls made during the play almost always seems to be called against the Bills when you had obvious ones not called on Philly. The hit to Kincade was a headshot on the defenseless receiver, the PIs on the Sherfield and Diggs plays (which only one mattered if o remember right) among others.

          Again, those shouldn’t have mattered. The refs didn’t make Cook drop that pass, Allen and Gabe miss at the end, or make Phillips be a dumb hot head. But it sure felt like one team was given the benefit of the doubt while the other wasn’t.

  • UnspokenFor1@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the same Slay and Bradberry that admitted that WR and CB tug and pull all game between each other , ooh btw the miss TD between Allen & Gabe Davis , Davis literally pushed Slay to get separation.

    • Papaloxs@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They also had a lineman illegally down field on a touchdown. Missed calls happen for both teams throughout games. Refs call things differently each week. Your hope is they call the game consistently and the same standards for both teams (let both teams get away with the same stuff, etc.). We were mad about the holding at the end of the Super Bowl because they weren’t calling it all game on either team. Defensive players get an understanding during the game of what is okay and what isn’t for the refs. It’s similar to baseball umpire. They don’t always call a perfect strike zone but you want them to be consistent on what is a ball and what is a strike for both teams.