• snail_hatan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t understand why anyone would downvote, besides lame christians. This is gold!

    Edit: changed word order for clarity

      • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is nothing sexual about the image and nudity alone is not an issue.
        The only person sexualising a child here is you. Stop being a fucking creep.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a kid’s chest in a completely non-sexual scenario.

        Man the US is weird. In most of the developed world, when they see a child’s chest, be it in a pool, at the beach, in a sauna, whatever, people don’t jump to thoughts of paedophilia.

        It’s a chest. Sure if she was depicted doing something suggestive, I’d agree. But this is just a person standing there, depicted as being “reborn”.