favoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 7 days agoDo you agree with this?lemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square179linkfedilinkarrow-up1909arrow-down129
arrow-up1880arrow-down1external-linkDo you agree with this?lemmy.zipfavoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square179linkfedilink
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·6 days agoNo, it should be 10% at least.
minus-squareFlyingCircus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 days agoWe could tax a billionaire 95% of their wealth, and they would still have more money than you or I could reasonably spend in a lifetime.
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 days agoOh yeah, I’m a big proponent of no more billionaires. But it appears to a lot of average people smaller amounts are more palpable because they think they’ll ever be that rich.
No, it should be 10% at least.
We could tax a billionaire 95% of their wealth, and they would still have more money than you or I could reasonably spend in a lifetime.
Oh yeah, I’m a big proponent of no more billionaires. But it appears to a lot of average people smaller amounts are more palpable because they think they’ll ever be that rich.