• Magrath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    These sites need to start allowing users to blacklist sites from results. We know which sites are useless but keep showing up, let us block them from showing up.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s a great idea. I wonder if there is already an extension for this.

      It would be great if it were built into the search engine. They could publicize the top 100 blocked sites to hopefully change the behavior of these sites.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    At work, we have this tradition of naming our video call channels with random emojis.
    Yesterday, I named it 🎍 and a colleague asked what that emoji is supposed to be.

    The thing is, I had this conversation with another colleague before, when I chose that same emoji some months ago.

    In the emoji selector, it’s called “pine decoration”, so as Firefox readily told me, I had searched for those exact words before, in this case on Qwant, not Google.
    So, I directly opened that search result link from the browser history and the first page of search results just showed random Etsy links and such. For now, it still looks the same: https://www.qwant.com/?q=pine+decoration&t=web

    When I searched it a few months ago, I was amazed that the first link, along with the whole inline-Wikipedia-blurb, was the relevant result: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kadomatsu
    (This was also still in my browser history.)

    I don’t need to be amazed every time, but fuck me, it feels like the internet is having Alzheimer’s.

  • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m kind of concerned about search engines currently. Not that they’ll never exist but that they’ll fall to SEO stuff since major tech companies chosen option seems to be to pursue AI solutions. As great as I think they can be even if they’re flawed, they just aren’t a replacement for a traditional search.

    Hell even DuckDuckGo is failing me now.

  • draughtcyclist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Google allows ANYONE to submit links for crawling. It will also trust any hostname with any garbage content.

    I’ve been fighting the battle against spam from their platform for the last two years. I can no longer trust their user agents like I did in the past.

    If I see one more “SEO” query in Mandarin for “sexy little sister” or “sensual massage” with a telegram handle I’m going to lose my shit. They need some major policy changes if they want to maintain any source of credibility.

  • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Had just posted on Mildly Infuriating last week how this scourge has gone through the roof in the last few years; this is my business email, that’s not even listed any more -

    No, my name isn’t Poojah. Cheeky cunts

    • Mike@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I get these same exact emails, and often they’re from gmail accounts. Do you know what’s going on here?

      • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Basically computers getting cheaper so more folks from India can afford one now

        Best thing we can do is the “report spam” button, apparently it does work if enough people use it

  • Charles Fort would be proud@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hell, Google opened up the whole thing by prioritising sites with SEO. I really can’t find any pity in my heart for them.

    And honestly, by now we can just assume that SEO is spam. A search engine worth its salt should be able to find better results without it, just going on inbound links, traffic and (shock! horror!) relevant keywords in the actual content.

    It’s a radical idea, I know.

  • Yewb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is dumb, they are prioritizing paid adds for almost the whole first page of results.