• volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    (Preface: I am team genocide. I also live in Germany. Germany’s politics are a disgrace, but I digress.)

    What annoys me about this is that this discussion gets so much media attention and focus, while it doesn’t matter in this very moment. I understand that there are implications if it will be defined as a genocide. But right now people are being killed every day en masse and they frankly give a crap about whether they died in a mass murder or terrorist attack or a genocide.

    It reminds me of the early days of the Ukraine war when everyone was so obsessed with comparing Putin to Hitler (Putler is still a popular term) and the discussion was high on whether Putins actions amount to fascism or not, with a lot of internet laymen but also experts on that subject chiming in. When I asked a half Russian, half Ukrainian what their opinion was, their reply was something like “who the fuck cares? Call it a chicken pea pie, nobody cares, people are being killed, I don’t give a crap. Somewhen in the future people will be looking back and asking the same question, but it doesn’t matter right now.” And it stuck with me.

    If I understand correctly, the ICJ will rule again on the case in a couple of years (?), which obviously isn’t relevant right now. It seems like the ruling would have an aftermath in retrospect but even if they ruled it were a genocide today, nothing much would change directly - but please correct me if I am wrong here.

    But what definitely doesn’t matter is what we think. What matters is what is happening. And it doesn’t need a name to be evil and detrimental.

    • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Germany has supplied 30% of Israel s weapons, and has continued to do so during this ongoing genocide. If Germany or the US were to acknowledge the ongoing genocide, they’d have to stop supplying those arms immediately, hence stopping the annihilation of Gaza. So it’s of immense importance to keep repeating what most of the world already acknowledges: this is a genocide, and those arming the perpetrators are complicit in their crimes. History will not judge Germany kindly, but I guess that’s not exactly a new thing for a veteran perpetrator of genocide.

      • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ok, this sounds valid. But what would oblige them to stop them from delivering weapons if the ICJ rules it is a genocide? Is there any legal obligation, can they denounce the ruling?

        If you mean acknowledge in a sense of civilian/political acknowledgement, then my issue with it is that it shouldn’t be necessary to be this anal about some definition. It’s splitting hairs on cut off heads. Supporting mass murder is wrong in the context of genocide as well as outside of it. It shouldn’t be necessary to convince the governments that it is a genocide to convince them to stop supplying weapons.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Israel already received an ICJ ruling to immediately stop their blocking of aid which they ignored.

          It’s safe to say the ICJ is nothing but a feel good tool that everyone including the West ignores when inconvenient.

        • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The US and Germany are both signatories of the UN arms trade treaty . This is article 6 (3):

          “A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) or of items covered under Article 3 or Article 4, if it has knowledge at the time of authorization that the arms or items would be used in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, attacks directed against civilian objects or civilians protected as such, or other war crimes as defined by international agreements to which it is a Party”

          Mass murder is the name of the game in war. So arming other militaries is always in support of mass murder. But in the eyes of international law some mass murder is acceptable as part of war. Genocide and the other crimes recounted above however, have been deemed to cross the threshold of acceptability in international law, and therefore are meant to stop the transfer of arms immediately. If the US and Germany were to acknowledge that these crimes are being perpetrated by Israel, they’d have to stop transferring arms. Mass murder in itself is admittedly wrong, but that alone is not sufficient to trigger a halt to arms exports. Therefore, it is of great importance to keep repeating: this is a genocide, and those arming the perpetrators are complicit in their crimes.

          • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thank you, that is a very helpful insight!

            crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, attacks directed against civilian objects or civilians protected as such, or other war crimes as defined by international agreements

            Why do we then seem to hear only about the genocide controversy? Wouldn’t it be easier/faster/more obvious to argue for all the other crimes mentioned above?

            • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              That’s because the crime of genocide tends to contain within it multiple instances of crimes against humanity, breaches of the Geneva convention, attacks against civilians and so on. It’s basically the ultimate crime containing all the other crimes within it. And the highest authority on international law in the World, the ICJ, has said that it is plausible that what Israel is doing amounts to a genocide. It really is very clear and simple, if you’re willing to see things as they are.

          • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What exactly are people referring to when the label this a genocide? Like, what line was crossed where this changed from defending against terrorists to commiting a genocide, in your opinion? (I’m genuienly curious, couldnt really find anything specific on this)

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        American companies allegedly kept on working with Nazi Germany after the US entered the war. Therefore, unless Israel gets on the UN stand and says, “Yes, we’re committing genocide and y’all’s are next” no one will let non-white deaths affect the bottom line.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      ”i am team genocide"

      -volvoxvsmarla

      I dunno, can we trust them? Agree tho; people are dying and it needs to stop no matter what we call it, even if there were no larger implications; its fucking pointless and needs to stop.