• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What are some reasons as to why I would want to use this over, say, OSMAnd?

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      OsmAnd may have lots of features but it’s heavy and clunky. Organic Maps on the other hand is quite light and very fast. If you don’t need the some features OsmAnd has, Organic Maps is a way better experience.

    • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is way way lighter weight and is overall a better experience. I use osmand for routing because the voice is much better tuned (OM just says barely-useful things like “turn left” instead of “turn left at Broadway”. I think both have their uses. If the voice was better I would use OM exclusively.

      • ryguyflyguy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Organic Map’s voice turning instructions were just recently updated to include the street name (at least in the iOS TestFlight, not sure if it’s in the official release yet). This was something that was preventing me from fully switching over but since this change it is much more usable imo

        • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh yay! Happy times. The fdroid version doesn’t have that yet but I look forward to the update.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I see, that’s very useful for lower end devices then. If I ever need voice, I’ll stick to OSMAnd then for now.

    • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Both are great but I find Organic better for searches and has a simpler UI (so a good replacement for google maps) but OsmAnd has more technical features and better for using offline, importing GPS tracks etc. I use Organic maps in the car and OsmAnd for hiking, cycling and sharing GPS coordinates.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not that big of a deal to me personally, the app is still brilliant and open to the community. But given the community this is posted in I understand the concern and alternatives like Organic Maps are great for that.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I use both all the time. Organic Maps rendering and navigation feels snappier, even with 2.5D support, and less cluttered, but since I do contribute to OpenStreetMap, OsmAnd is unmatched for editing and access to power tools like up-to-date data, GPS tracking, PDI editions, etc.

      Unfortunately, in my country the map is not as complete as the proprietary options, so, using OsmAnd is more practical for me. As a regular user, though, I’d prefer Organic Maps.

    • CAVOK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Take StreetComplete with you when you’re out and do pokemon-style quests while at the same time improve the map of the area you’re in.
      It’s very fun and quite addictive, and the data you’re providing is open source so it’s not free labour for some huge company.

    • yotsen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      If the maps in your area are incomplete, you have the power to change that by editing OpenStreetMap. Organic Maps updates its maps about once a month by pulling data from OpenStreetMap.

        • Semperverus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I think this is to prevent organicmaps users from DDOSing the OSM servers by constantly streaming map data from them

            • Semperverus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m honestly fine with it.

              Saying “we need a better system” without understanding why we have the current system we do is not helpful.

              I work with hosting services and resource constraints every day at work.

              Someone like Google can give you instantaneous updates because they have billions of dollars and can host data farms across the globe for billions of users to access whenever they feel like it.

              OpenStreetMaps likely doesn’t have this kind of funding and gets by on what they have. They are running fine now on the small amount of users they have, but if the usage suddenly 10x’d or 100x’d overnight from a popular app like Organic Maps switching to realtime downloads straight from the tap, the servers would ignite (not literally, I hope).

              What I would like you to do is draft up a proposal for how to overcome the financial and technical hurdles needed to allow a much larger userbase to constantly hit the OSM service. This would be a much better use of your time. Once you’re done, submit it to the Organic Maps and OpenStreetMaps staff to try to get it moving forward, or at least talked about.

  • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is this what Komoot uses?

    I’ve been so impressed with the pathways etc, it’s amazing

    • B0rax@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Komoot uses openstreetmap, yes. Organic maps is a different client for openstreetmap.