• edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    I’m sure they definitely won’t underpay and overwork the people working on it to get it out by an arbitrary deadline…

  • stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    I hate that I didn’t know the second ended on a cliff hanger when I watched it. Wish I had known, since I would have avoided it and waited for the third movie to watch it all. Cliff hanger still passes me off.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      It doesn’t even foreshadow a cliff hanger is coming. It just ends mid conversation. No buildup or anything. Not a fun movie.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      It ended on a cliff hanger?

      Honestly can’t remember much of the film compared to the first.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      When the first Lord of the Rings movie came out, it ended, and a guy stood up behind me and yelled “DAMN! THAT’S IT???!?!?”

      I got to explain “No, no, there’s TWO MORE…”

  • KRAW@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Wouldn’t be surprised if the 3rd movie was bad. 2nd one was very unsatisfying. It didn’t feel like it stood very well on its own, and it felt like the majority of the movie was spent explaining the whole “cannon” concept.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Every scene dragged on forever past it’s point. It was aggravating to watch compared to the first movie. And then bam, it just ends out of nowhere. They could have cut a ton of time out of it with better editing.