I never could get Nix working but maybe someone will
Wireguard is p2p.
EDIT: I guess the point is it’s doing peer discovery without static public IPs or DNS. Pretty cool!
YAML?? (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
what: is: your: - problem - with: YAML # At least you can have comments unlike in json. Who need comments in a config file anyway.
Nothing too major about how it’s usually used, but the yaml spec does allow arbitrary code execution when parsing a file and relies on the parser to have that feature disabled: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML#Security
That’s why for python,
yaml.save_load()
is a thing. That’s fine for your local config files and may even be a feature for you, but it shouldn’t be used to exchange information between services.nit: you mean
yaml.safe_load()
.Oh yeah, of course.
Is this made by the same guy who does hyprland?
@semperverus @possiblylinux127 No, this other person has a working ‘e’ key on their keyboard.
Interesting, it’s on AUR, I will try it.
So it doesn’t need any port forwarding, and works on CGNAT? How the “NAT hole punching” works? Both clients connect to something on IPFS?
Afaik, for DHT with torrent, clients need to know at least one tracker, what is the “tracker” here? Something on IPFS? Who am I sending my IP addresses?
How much overhead does this add to speed? I love with Wireguard, that it’s barely noticeable, really close to p2p speeds, OpenVPN was awful in this regard.
DHT is autonomous and does not require a tracker. Usually it is only used as a fallback as a regular tracker is quicker. It’s p2p, and is split accross people hosting it.