• Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Rich is relative, easy to feel rich when they have no costs since they’re living in thier parents basement.

  • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No overhead, no cameras.

    So if he isn’t taking any pictures at all he must just be getting face pics from brides and using them as part of a prompt?

    Each to their own but personally I don’t understand why someone would do this. To my mind the purpose of a picture is so that you can look back at something that happened in the past or show others who weren’t there.

    I could understand it being fun to mess around with an AI yourself and make those kinds of pics if they’re the type of thing you’re into. But are people getting pics like OP is making and sharing them? Hanging them on their wall? Pretending they were real? I find that quite sad.

    • Nfamwap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      People don’t want photos for the memories, they want them for their socials.

      I don’t see a problem with anon making a profit from his shallow, vapid customers.

      • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yea I mean if it sells then go for it. I’m just surprised that people at that level of narcissism are out there. Like their family are going to know the pics are bullshit if they had a real wedding or even if they faked it entirely so they’re paying for something purely to pretend to strangers and acquaintances online or themselves. But maybe I should just embrace it and try to make some money out of this phenomena myself.

    • bokherif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah I understand your opinion. But then you know how scummy the wedding industry is. A flower that costs $10, suddenly costs $200 because it’s a bridal flower or whatever

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        From what I hear it’s three factors: increased quality control because the customer is less likely to brush things off for their wedding, increased customer service because they will use more of your time and energy and take shit out on you, and finally because they can everyone else is doing it

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Brides paying for that is the real problem, not the fact that anon photographer is profiting off it.

    I make their weddings look like their pinterest dreams, they can look as skinny and hot as they want

    The only folks who are losing anything here are photoshoppers.

  • tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    I crave the point in time when all content, all images, everything will be AI generated. Nothing will feel real or genuine anymore. People will lose interest and demand imperfections and crudeness again. In short, I’m all for AI acceleration because I fucking hate it

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That seems totally fine. If he is upfront with clients that images are AI generated/uptouched, not real photos, and that is what they are paying for, that’s just called running a business that innovated a saturated market. He found a way to produce a product and do it cheaper than everyone else.

    Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing “real” memories? Personally I’d say yup. But that is my personal preference and not that of the clients.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t understand how because to make people look hot using ai you still need to make real pictures.

        So either they just expanded the business with a popular side project or he has customers send their own pictures (which are rarely in the format, proportions, light conditions you need)

        Most likely it never happened.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago
          • “Send a photo like this and I’ll AI it up”
          • Client sends a photo like the one anon asked
          • anon runs the photo on AI thingy, gets some results
          • anon shows the result to client

          I suspect the pics only need to have the person a similar enough pose to what they want, the AI generates the clothes and environment

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Personally I would be more disturbed if he offered and delivered real photos but never had showed up at the wedding (to my knowledge as the client).

    • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed.

      Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing “real” memories? Personally I’d say yup.

      And as long as other people feel the same way, regular photographers will still have clients.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      But pretty much all wedding photos are edited, so none of them are real photos.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Plus they are so generic that 99% of people you show them to will have forgotten them a second after the photo leaves their field of vision.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or actually have photos of people? Or it actually be her.

      Like ai is good, but it’s not going to look like you

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      True, there are some people who don’t have 5 fingers (4and a thumb for you weirdos).

      as part of your prompt you can specify digits and use negative prompts to lower the number of digits. On my 2070 I can push out an image every 17ish seconds so having a better cards means you can push out more faster. If the image has an odd digit you can not use it for upscaling.

      • drolex@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        With this method, I manage to get 14-fingered hands reliably. After that, the results get worse. 15-fingered hands work about 50% of the time. Asking for more fingers usually results in the summoning of a demon octopus, which is annoying to get rid of.

        The nurseries and childcare facilities I work with are not thrilled but I love my job.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    even better, anyone can have equally bland photos of marrying whoever they want! your creepy stalker can imagine himself marrying you too!

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why bother with the wedding at all? Just sit on the couch alone and swipe through fake pictures of someone who doesn’t even look like you at a wedding that never happened! That’s where the real savings kick in!

    On the plus side, at least Anon can now dispell any rumors about his love life with photos of his TOTALLY REAL marriage to his 14 year old waifu who is actually an 800 year old wizard!

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m wondering the same thing, and want to believe the story is fake.

      Our wedding wasn’t super fancy, but why would I want fake pictures of something that never happened? It doesn’t make sense to me at all

      • tomenzgg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I mean, you always see this around new technology/fads, all the time. When it’s new or ongoing, there’s either an excitement at the novelty or being in the minority of people doing it; people see the chance to do some of the things that fix limitations of the current process and there’s always those willing to try that out.

        For a day that’s already compounded with expectation and often hyped as a sort of zenith in one’s life, it’s easy to see being able to customize things exactly to the way you’re having them play out in your head as really alluring.

        And, once the hype dies down or we get used to the novel aspects, all the things you mentioned with get greater focus in the general attention, again, and people will likely value those things more (because, ultimately, you’re not wrong).

        But I do feel like this is a pretty consistent phenomenon with almost any trend and you always see an uptick of adopters because the ability to solve some pain points is novel.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        why would I want fake pictures of something that never happened?

        Seems to be a popular part of tourism in the age of Instagram.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        When we were picking out a photographer for our wedding, we heard a piece of advice that had stuck with me over the years. Which was to think of wedding photos as an appreciating asset that gets more valuable over time.

        You can look at your photos the week after the wedding and they might not seem all that special. The memories are still fresh and not much has changed. But then when you look at them on your 10th or 20th anniversary , it brings up those memories you had forgotten about. It reminds you of happy times with friends and relatives that might be dead now. Fast forward to 50 years later and those pictures might be the most priceless thing that you have.

        So yeah… AI photos might fill that Instagram need of modern weddings, but long-term feel completely worthless. Hoping this story is fake as well, but wouldn’t be surprised if there’s some truth to it.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol, keep doing it, they should adapt. Stable diffusion is literally free.

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is. But if you fully and openly disclose that’s what you’re doing when selling a individual a personalized product for literally their own enjoyment, I don’t see the harm.

        Sure, the client isn’t going to tell people that weren’t there that it’s all generated, but what’s the problem? Someone might believe you were media-attractive 10 years ago at your wedding?

        Photography probably put a lot of portrait painters out of business, but it didn’t destroy painting as an art form.

        Grab that bag, man.