• Kogie13@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And now the World Cup will have 48 teams, which means more matches, which means more weeks of the tournament, which means more money. I remember the idea of the World Cup occurring every two years being floated around and it wouldn’t surprise me if that ends up happening. I feel like greed is going to end up killing this sport, especially the competitiveness of it

  • ThunderStella@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eventually the players will not have a summer off.

    At the end of every season will be a few weeks of a break, then prepping for the next tournament, then a few weeks break followed by pre season.

  • JKKIDD231@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they will make the big cash cow in Saudi 2034. No way they break the Qatar numbers till then

  • DexM23@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, the most controversal ones, you know people want to boykott where the best by far revenue wise?

  • ghengilhar@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if they push that through that’s the straw that breaks the camels back and ends FIFA.

  • mg10pp@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, maybe he was predicting where they will play next season 🤷‍♂️

  • luigitheplumber@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it’s fair to conflate the expansion of the tournament with a hypothetical increase in frequency. While both bring in more money, the former does have sporting value and occasional expansion is healthy, even if it does have downside. The frequency however, should not be altered and is a pure cashgrab