As far as I see that instance is a far-right cess pool. Everything I’ve got from that instance were low-quality transphobic “news articles”.

  • kbity@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nazis aren’t welcome here, best they learn that now rather than through a long process of being told by everyone else here to fuck off.

    • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And then it’s usually the most low-IQ people you’ve ever seen. So even if you are a person with controversial opinions and would like to discuss them, you can’t even do that properly.

      E.g. imagine that you like cryptocoins, but see some kind of problem with them that you would like to argue about… Everything you get is an angry Mob with nonsense responses.

  • Milan@discuss.tchncs.deM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    After a while of thinking and reviewing, I have come to the conclusion to defederate as requested. If they correct course, I’ll happily re-review them.

      • Kantiberl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        While it’s crucial to oppose harmful ideologies like Nazism, we must be wary of how we define such harmful groups. If we broaden these definitions arbitrarily, we risk encapsulating people who merely differ politically, diluting the term’s significance and unjustifiably alienating individuals. In doing so, we inadvertently shrink our own communities, polarizing society to the extent where a moderate viewpoint might be mistaken for extremism. Right-leaning communities fall into this trap as well, resulting in fragmented realities where each group exists in its own echo chamber. This division deepens societal fissures and undermines moderate views, which, in my belief, are grounded in reality and thus instrumental in achieving balanced discourse.

        • artisanrox@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Soooooo here’s a helpful hint to tamp down that utter confusion you seem to be having:

          The guys who want armed guard genital inspectors in front of every bathroom are the bad guys.

          • Kantiberl@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who exactly holds the authority to label ‘the bad guys’? Sure, some actions are undeniably harmful, but does that warrant placing all perceived wrongdoers in the same category, from internet trolls to murderers? Is there no nuance or room for varying degrees of transgressions? I hope you can ask yourself if you’re always on the side of righteousness, or might you be perceived as 'the bad guy" from another perspective? It’s important to understand that the world is not simply binary, and such a mindset can dangerously oversimplify complex issues.

  • tookmyname@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bigotry should be banned, and removed from this instance. That means not allowing bigotry on our instance. That means defederating from less clever wannabe 4chans, and less moderated The_D replacements.

    They can enjoy their shithole federation.