• bungotronic@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    for everyone that says that it would not cost much to offer 16Gb as base, what they would be forgoing is an easy $200 upsell. cost is not the issue, it is forgone margin

    • GladiatorUA@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this needs to stop. I hope we magically hit the hardware improvement wall, at least for phones, and have to optimize the software for like a decade. Bruteforcing shitty bloated code with hardware pains me.

  • rTpure@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    a lot of comments in r/apple defending having 8gb in a $1600 pro laptop

    the problem isn’t apple, if their customer base willingly pays for it, then why wouldn’t apple take advantage

  • FrostedGiest@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple really needs to stop being cheap 2 months before 2024 and make 16GB the base RAM.

    Reminds me of the 16GB base storage model during the early iPhone days.

    • trillykins@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple really needs to stop being cheap with

      Why would they? People are going to buy their shit regardless since they managed to turn computer hardware into a brand-name and Apple knows it better than anyone.

  • botohowotoh@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yup, and you can’t use the “it’s an Air laptop, buy a Pro for workloads like this” excuse in this scenario either.

  • herbalblend@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They coulda gone to 12gb, still differentiated slightly from pro line and it would have saved them all this trouble…

    I can’t imagine the cost difference between 2x4 and 2x6 was worth this publicity

  • abbzug@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Selling a $1600 laptop with 8gb should have earn them as much derision as the apocryphal Bill Gates quote about 640k.

    • red286@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Selling a $1600 laptop with 8gb should earn them as much derision as the apocryphal Bill Gates quote about 640k.

      Moreso, really, because at the time that quote was attributed, 640K was at least sufficient for the vast majority of people.

      In 2023, 8GB unified RAM isn’t adequate for much beyond browsing the internet. These benchmarks clearly show that you lose a huge amount of performance (well over 50%) going with 8GB over 16GB.

    • EitherGiraffe@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 8 GB M1 Air my girlfriend uses works fine for photo editing and even basic video editing in Final Cut.

      The thing is that it was 950€ almost 3 years ago and even back then 8 GB at that price point was below average.

      The 8 GB M3 Pro is being sold for 1999€ right now, while even garbage 600€ HP laptops ship with 16 GB.

  • skycake10@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll still defend the 8GB base config for a Macbook Air, but it’s just not reasonable for a MBP.

    • rsta223@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d defend it if the Air were a $500 machine, but at $1k, 8GB is unacceptable.

      12 would maybe be reasonable, but come on, my phone, which was about the same price as a MacBook Air well over a year ago has more RAM (12GB) and more storage (512 GB). That’s just totally unacceptable.

  • Wild-subnet@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes 16G on a MacBook is better than 8G on a MacBook. Was anyone but YouTubers doubting this?

    The real test would be to call out Apple’s marketing BS and actually test an 8G MacBook vs 16G Window laptop. But let’s be real, 8G on a “pro” machine is ridiculous no matter how you slice it.

  • Proglamer@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It goes without saying that “you’re testing it wrong”. Think different (i.e. special)!

  • SentinelOfLogic@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone that who has a reasonable understanding of computers would know that nothing other than dedicated GPU RAM (which Apple SoCs do not have) would make a system with less main RAM equivalent to a system with more main RAM (and only in certain workloads).

    All claims that somehow the Apple SoC’s “unified memory” makes them require less RAM are nothing less than bald face lies!

  • Ryu83087@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    of course. Apple really should have a talk with that guy from marketing and stop him from spreading lies.