Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell struck up a friendship during their nearly quarter-century in the Senate together. Now in their 80s, the Democratic president and the Senate GOP leader appear to be giving political cover to each other as they fend off questions about their advanced age and health issues.

Notably, McConnell, R-Ky., 81, hasn’t joined Donald Trump, 77, and other Republicans who have attacked Biden’s age, health and mental acuity as he seeks re-election.

And after McConnell’s second freeze-up last week, Biden was one of the first to call McConnell, telling reporters that his “friend” sounded like “his old self” and that such episodes are a “part of his recovery” from a fall and a concussion this year.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    complicate attacks on Biden’s age

    No they really don’t. They’ll talk about Biden’s “obvious mental decline” and they’ll just not talk at all about Mitch’s very public 30 second Journeys Beyond the Stars. They’ll absolutely say Biden is too old but that Trump, who is only 3 years younger, isn’t. The right is absolutely capable of that level of doublethink. Stop assuming anything matters to them other than getting power they can use to hurt people. They don’t care about policy. They don’t care about seeming like hypocrites. They’ve been whipped into a paranoid frenzy and they’ll do anything they need to do in order to hurt the people they’re afraid of. Start looking at their behavior through that lens and see if it doesn’t start to make a lot of sense to you.

      • 432hz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, Biden is 3 years older than trump.

        I don’t see any mental decline… Biden has always been a gaffe machine and he has a stutter he struggles to suppress. He’s the same as ever.

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He’s also wildly unhealthy, and if his lifestyle is to be believed, he probably should’ve died years ago. The only thing keeping him going is fake tan, hair dye, and hate.

        Biden is too old, but he at least looks somewhat healthy.

  • VegaLyrae@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do have to admit, after getting concussed I also appeared to freeze but I was thinking hard of what the right word is to say next.

    That said, probably anyone in concussion recovery should be on leave from legislating. The brain will heal more slowly, and your work will be of poor quality.

    That’s all before getting into the actual politics of having a gerentocracy.

    I know a lot of people have talked a out adding an age limit, but it seems to me most of the ancient ones are skating by on incumbent effect. If we had term limits it would resolve that. Alternatively something like the Virginia Gubernatorial rules where you cannot hold the position successively.

    • Jah348@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have the same occasional issue with forgetting words after a TBI, and have worked with people in recover who have it much worse than I. It’s an interesting outcome when simple words just cannot be recalled. To fabricate an example; I know what this object is, a tool for writing, it’s in my hand, it has ink, but what the hell is it called. (a pen) - it can be for the most mundane and common words.

      However; I don’t go slackjaw and become completely nonresponsive for 10-20 seconds. This guy needs to be in medical care.

      • VegaLyrae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right, it’s never as long as this. I am young, though so I don’t know how it would show in an ancient man hahaha.

        I don’t see the appeal in insisting everything is fine. I would rather see my leaders saying “hey, I don’t feel good so I’m going to take some time to get healthy”.

        • Jah348@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The hubris of man

          I appreciated that about Fetterman. I feel as though he presented his injury as something humans go through. He will continue his job, at times with assistance, and do the best he is able. He didn’t need to step down and he is not incapable of doing his job, but he has a flaw and is honest of it.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno I don’t feel good about setting laws about who should be eligible to run for public office. The voters should decide who is eligible and who isn’t.

      Yeah there’s a lot of dumb voters out there, but the general idea that we’re smarter than the voters and therefore need to make laws that supersede the voters feels wrong to me.

      I think the problem of voters being dumb is just something we have to accept about democracy.

      • Sylver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Voters being dumb and electing incumbent yet incapable people is not just democracy, but populism. Especially when those in power have been in power for so long that they meddle in education funding to keep said voters dumb

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Democracy and populism are mutually exclusive?

          Especially when those in power have been in power for so long that they meddle in education funding to keep said voters dumb

          Improving education is indeed the solution to the problem. And it’s a thing that is more likely to happen than a law prohibiting those currently in power from running again.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            IMO it’s useless talking about what laws or policies need to change to fix this because the people with the power to change it know that doing so will affect their ability to stay in power and just won’t change it to their detriment. It’s the same reason protesting won’t ever fix the fundamental issues. The people currently at the top aren’t just going to hand their power away or cripple their ability to easily generate or access wealth. If it comes to it, they’ll go to war before giving that up.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then it follows that it’s also useless to even discuss such things on the internet. So why even bring up these topics if it’s impossible to change anything?

              Or are you just spending time posting on the internet in an attempt discourage others from trying to improve things?

              • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Solving a problem requires understanding it. I’m not trying to discourage improvement but want more people to see what I see about the nature of what’s going on and how many of these flaws in the system aren’t seen that way by the people who pass the laws and make the policies.

      • VegaLyrae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the beauty of the “can’t hold the position consecutively” rule.

        It doesn’t matter what age, party, or how long you’ve been in office.

        You can always run for a different office, or wait for the next term to run again.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know either. It feels shortsighted and bigoted to do things like that. The issue is that when votes in Kentucky vote the rest of us have to endure how they vote. Term limits could and should be tried. So even when the voters make a mistake the mistake doesn’t linger around.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The solution is simply better education. Which solves a lot of problems beyond codgers like Mitch McConnell. There are plenty of other terrible people running for office that wouldn’t be prevented from doing so by such laws. But these terrible people wouldn’t have a chance of winning an election in a better educated population.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally just yesterday Fox had some other attack piece on Biden and the picture they used of Biden he looked totally zonked-out.

    McConnell’s walking-dead impersonation changes nothing for Republicans. Hypocrisy means nothing to those people.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What annoys me is their main demographics are about the same age. I would have thought moving the elderly while begging for their vote was a bad idea but I guess that is why I am not in politics.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fox is so fucking bizarre. I mean, everyone hears about it, but unless you’re stuck in some type of torture chamber where you can’t switch the channel, you just can’t comprehend how overt and low effort the fake propaganda is on there. It blows my mind every year or three when I get stuck somewhere where it’s on.

      • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d be surprised at the number of American households that voluntarily put themselves in such a torture chamber

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a couple friends who’s older family members just run Fox 24/7. And from what they tell me, it’s not fun having family members like that. I feel very lucky.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It is not. Before Fox we had Alex Jones, Coast-to-Coast, Imus, and Rush on all the time at my house growing up. Mom would get really angry if you tried to turn the radio volume lower. Of course we lived in the middle of nowhere so it was mostly static. It was this constant background noise of my childhood.

            I can still remember being about 6 or so and asking my mom “what did liberals do to that man to make him so angry all the time?”. Pretty sure it was Rush I was referring to but might have been some other screaming radio guy. My dad lost it when Imus said something bigoted, and got fired. I endured two weeks of rants about it.

            Part of the reason why I avoid talking about politics around my kids. I am a bit leftwing and that is my thing, my kids don’t need to be captive audiences to me about this stuff. Besides we got Legos and woodwork to do.

      • jo3shmoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The same people who voluntarily put themselves in that torture chamber then tell me that Fox “has really gone downhill” so they’ve gotta get their Newsmax. Totally disconnected from the reality of the world.

  • Shalakushka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This would be devastating if conservatives cared at all about hypocrisy or logical consistency.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          60
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s so weird how everyone expects progressives to be just as hypocritical as moderates and conservatives…

          Bernie would 100% be down for it and immediately pivot to outreach or something else if he could hold office.

          He’s been saying he’s not more important than the movement for decades now

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m by no means obsessed with the guy, but one thing really solidified my respect for him: before I ever knew who he was he always would show up in a random documentary if US government was ever spoken about, and he was always on the “right side” of whatever the documentary was about. Then in the run up to 2016 he shows up and I’m like “holy crap it’s that guy!”

          • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bernie is an ineffectual, failure of a career politician who can’t get anything done, not even rally the support of his own party, let alone the whole country. He’s a dinosaur who has been too long in politics and lives a few rungs above us all on the ladder and has no idea how we really live.

            We need someone young and capable to rally behind, forget Bernie.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              37
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              We need someone young and capable to rally behind, forget Bernie.

              Literally what Bernie has been saying for 20 years champ, glad you agree with him

              • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                22
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yet HE ran for president and failed. If Bernie wants young blood, why the fuck was he running?

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What he said…

                  Raising awareness for the progressive cause, and motivating the youth to participate in politics. Not just voting in the general, but voting in the primary and running for office.

                  You’ve got really strong opinions about him, but don’t seem to know anything about him.

                  It really seems like the two of you agree on a lot. You’re just really uninformed…

                • notacat@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It is a failure of our system that a populist candidate without his name recognition would have no chance against the incredibly well-funded corporate shill neoliberals/conservatives we usually have to choose between.

            • Elderos@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              ·
              1 year ago

              About a hundred of his amendments made it in various bill proposal. A bunch of which became laws. You can’t really blame him for the broken party system in which he’s not even taking part. One man can’t single handly fix congress

            • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              1 year ago

              While I agree he didn’t do much from a legislative point of view, calling him a failure is missing the fact that he represented a voice that’s rarely heard in American politics, which might have paved the way people like AOC or Fetterman. Also the fact that he still holds the same views after 30 years is something that can serve as an antidote to cynicism. He’s an inspiring figure to many, and inspiration is important in politics.

              • sock@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                but he alone didnt change legislation (in a democracy) therefore he’s a failure

                • notacat@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes just like the anti-abortionists failed again and again until they succeeded in taking away rights. Building a movement takes time, especially if it’s not flush with corporate money.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Age limit tied to Social Security retirement age and joining the military, voting, smoking, and drinking tied to the same age (18 or 21, take your pick). We either need to say people are of the appropriate age to do these things, or not. This cherry-picking bullshit has to go. Also, term limits. The constitution wasn’t meant for a congressperson or senator to be in the same seat for 40+ years.

        • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree. I understand your viewpoint, but we need a more clear cut way to determine someone’s “maturity” to make their own decisions. Voting can be indirectly lethal (using the term very loosely here). Ask one of the women who couldn’t get an abortion and died from delivery complications, or the recent study that said the rollbacks the last president made for pollution is estimated to have caused tens of thousands of deaths, or lack of COVID restrictions enforcement. It’s also currently arbitrary whether someone is tried as an adult in the case of a teenager that commits a homicide. So is the ability to give consent for intercourse, and that has a remote possibility of lethality too (delivery complications, STDs, etc.).

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only there was some sort of system by which voters could choose who their candidates are. Like before the general election parties could have internal elections to decide the candidates.

      They could call it like a “First election” or even a “Primary election.”

      • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At this point it is economically unfeasible for anyone under 40, unless you are an affluent trust fund baby, to pay all the money required to run for a presidential campaign.

        This is why it’s always skewed towards old white men (hint: they can afford losing millions).

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Literally no one ever has paid all of the money required to run a Presidential Campaign.

          • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sounds like you can easily run for president then, eh? Hypothetically speaking, if you were forced by gunpoint to run, what’s stopping you in particular?

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My criminal history wouldn’t play well with voters. Small time drug possession, misdemeanor. It’s since been expunged (hence me having my current job), but that doesn’t mean it wouldn’t come up.

              Fun fact: I was actually offered the opportunity to run for state gov by my states party, and turned it down due to aforementioned criminal history.

              • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know what fucking fantasy reality you live in where no criminals run for office; we the attorney General of Texas, George Santos indictment, Americas mayor Rudy Juliani indictment, fucking Trump. We can keep going on literally forever listing criminal pieces of shit who have been in government positions.

                Your argument here is failing.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re describing situations that the public very much is aware of.

                  I’m not concerned with getting in trouble. I was concerned with winning the election and I know who my potential constituents would have been and their feelings on marijuana possession.

                  It’s on the ballot to be recreational in my state so maybe I’ll revisit after that passes, as the optics would improve significantly.

                  I’m not interested in running an already-uphill campaign with an albatross around my neck. Consider that, as a potential candidate, I have superior knowledge of my electorate than some random dude who doesn’t even know where I live.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Judging from the Republicans presidential candidates debate, the selection is limited to idiots, stupid idiots, and dangerous idiots.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s who their voters want. You’re mad at republican voters. I don’t know why people don’t realize that.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as you take Bernie with you. As a liberal I hate the hypocrisy of calling for term limits, while rallying behind Bernie, an ineffectual career politician who can’t get shit done and is all nice soundbites. He’s also a dinosaur.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          For sure. He’s got great ideas, but he doesn’t have that thing that makes people want to rally behind him. Like I mentioned, he couldn’t even get his own party’s nomination, which means he would have gotten wrecked in Presidential election.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that’s the problem. People aren’t well informed because of their sources. Media literacy/ skepticism/ critical thinking should be taught throughout our education. But that would transform the whole system , so it won’t. If you know how to do it, pass it on.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      democrats don’t want to win all the time, then they’d have to do stuff and keep improving

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        He polled terribly in his 2016 run. His popularity improved during Trump’s presidency, especially during the impeachment hearings, but the Republicans will hammer him on his relationship with the alleged Chinese spy Christine Fang

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m just saying it wouldn’t be a cakewalk with Swalwell. Honestly I don’t think it’s possible for any candidate to have a sweeping victory like Reagan vs Mondale anymore. The voters loyal to Trump at this point are just frothing at the mouth for a dictator. That alone should give any Democratic nominee a cakewalk victory, but we all saw how close the 2020 election was. The Republicans will use Christine Zang to whip up the MAGA base and that will be enough to make it close, at least without a double-digit surge in voter turnout. But again, if defeating the literal fascists isn’t enough to bring out the non-voters, then I can’t believe there exists a candidate who can motivate the independent and progressive non-voters to come out and vote with the liberals and centrists.

              • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Trump had private meetings with Putin and does Putin’s bidding, do you really think they’ll have a leg to stand on?

                No, I don’t. But that doesn’t matter to the republican voters. And that’s where I think the original assertion that the democractic party would have a cakewalk in 2024 with a candidate who is under 65 falls apart (let’s be honest, by definition a non-viable candidate can’t win, and Trump changed the definition of viable in 2016).

                You keep saying her name over and over and I had to look her up. They got nothing.

                You and I know that. But when Swalwell was seeing his approval ratings going up during Trump’s first impeachment hearing, this story is exactly what the republicans drudged up against him. And loyal republican voters will bring it up again if he runs for president again. And they’ll have no problem saying they have to vote against Swalwell because of it.

                I like Swalwell. I would vote for him in the general if he’s the nominee based on what I know right now. But I’m saying I don’t think there is any candidate who could unify the progressive, liberal, centrist, independent, and non-voters enough to make the election a cakewalk. It should have been a cakewalk in 2016, but it wasn’t. It should have been a cakewalk in 2020 but Trump actually received more votes than in 2016. He actually won the second most votes in the history of the country in 2020! And he’s out here spouting literal fascism, while actively being prosecuted for like 100 felonies, including trying to subvert our democracy (ie fascism) and he’s trouncing the other republican primary candidates! He’s polling over 50% in the primary, and the second place candidate has less than a third of that!

                The democrats could run literally Jesus, and I still think it would be a close election due him being a Jewish immigrant who hangs out with poor people and prostitutes (bunch of welfare moochers who just want free stuff and promote crime, think of the children), preaches we should sell our belongings to fund clothing, feeding, and sheltering the poor (communism!), and the whole love your neighbor thing (ie he’d probably tell Israel to chill out and be nice to the Palestinians, so that would totally ruin the Evangelicals’ plans for armageddon and the rapture).

          • cbarrick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            • Bachelor’s from Georgetown.
            • Master’s from the London School of Economics.
            • Experience as an Investigative journalist in Africa and the Middle East.
            • Interned in the Senate under civil rights icon John Lewis.
            • First ever millennial Senator.
            • Progressive (by American standards).

            Definitely well qualified.

            The only downside is that he’s pretty unknown, having only been a senator since 2021.

      • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m 6’2 230 lbs and I look WAY slimmer than Trump. He is lying about all of it.

        My guess is if you took away the lift shoes and actually measured the guy he’d be a bit shy of 6 foot and well over 300

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why do Democrats keep entertaining the notion that rank hypocrisy will ever be a dealbreaker for Republicans? They have decades of evidence to the contrary.

  • MeatsOfRage@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a 4 year age gap between Trump and Biden. Funny how 4 years ago Trump was saying Biden was too old for the job…

    • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      If trump were smart, (lol, bear with me) he would say “people didn’t mind voting for Biden at this age, so they shouldn’t mind me at this age either. But I promise not to run after the age of 80, unlike that frail old man who just wants to hide in his basement” or some shit like that. He lies all the fucking time, so he has nothing to lose and everything to gain by spinning that just a little bit.

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Trump were smart, he would have also said “we have the best scientists, and I only hire the best, you know, my personal friend Dr Fauci agrees with me that all patriots should wear masks to beat the China virus, and we’re going to have beautiful vaccines, the very very best vaccines, and we’re gonna use so much of them you won’t believe how great we are at beating this virus, we’re gonna be sick of being healthy.” and would probably have handily won reelection.

        • CMLVI@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, he did at first. Lmao and then (idk the order in which it happened) he flipped with his base to “vaccines will give you rabies and chemically castrate you” when they started coming out. He initially bragged about how fast he was helping companies develop the vaccine, then it came out and he decided to trash them

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            They celebrate Operation Warp Speed at the same time they talk about being “pure blooded” lmao

            These people do not have brains.

        • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not only that, but he could’ve made millions off of red maga facemasks too. All he had to do was let the experts run the shit they’re experts in while taking credit for putting the right people on top of it. The election wouldn’t have even been close. It would’ve been like the Reagan reelection.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    These are people that have mastered doublethink, there is absolutely no such complication for people inside the GOP bubble. For everyone else, yeah, it’s one more minor bit of hypocrisy, but it’s not even a thing for the bleach-koolaid drinkers.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    No it doesn’t, because the same people complaining about Biden are usually masters of doublethink anyway.