• imbluedabudeedabuda@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    • too many games.

    • not enough rotation because every player is expensive.

    • players are getting more athletic so more forces put into the ground at higher speeds and shorter ground contact times.

    • time off between seasons are way too short. pre seasons are way too short. 4 week preseason to go from sedentary to game speed is nowhere near enough.

    • SoWhatNoZitiNow@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do the players even have long enough of an offseason for them to really be considering “from sedentary” at the beginning of the pre-season? The players who are called up to offseason international tournaments definitely don’t.

    • TheDirtyOnion@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of these make sense. While I think longer pre-seasons would be helpful, describing players as “sedentary” when they come into camp is not true at all. Players are on conditioning schedules during the break now. They may not come in at 100%, but they aren’t starting from anywhere near zero either.

      I am also not sure teams are viewing players they need to spend millions acquiring as expendable, and probably are investing quite a bit in avoiding injuries as much as they can (while still running those players out as often as possible).

    • VaudevilleVillain@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      time off between seasons are way too short. pre seasons are way too short. 4 week preseason to go from sedentary to game speed is nowhere near enough.

      This point is so true. I follow some american sports and they get an incredible amount of time off compared to footballers. NFL, MLB and NBA get months off whereas footballers get 6-8 weeks at most. Less if there is an international tournament.

    • blurr90@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These points all apply to the seasons before. Why is it now a 15% increase? None of it is an explanation for that.

      And I just say this: Why the fuck do these teams have a medical staff, when they aren’t able to to check player health and manage their load?

    • Blue_winged_yoshi@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t overlook winter World Cup’s impact, that last season just didn’t end add in how competitive pre-season is getting (tours are not hammering a couple of local J-league sides anymore, it’s Arsenal and Utd kicking lumps out of each other!), when is the break? When was pre-season?

      Also something I’d add is it’s not just player price, some of the most overworked players are youth products. Look at how much football Gavi and Saka have played last couple years.

      Final point is PL related but the number of points needed to win a league now with how competitive the league is all the way down makes rotating players out hard. Sure Man City can rotate between Grealish and Doku, but how many even big sides have a £100m player and a back up £70m player with both happy to be there?

    • empiresk@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      not enough rotation because every player is expensive so you’re not going to rotate out your 100m man when every game is must win.

      That is on the clubs. Top clubs have capacity to rotate but refuse to.

      • ThereWillBeGoals@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see this repeated a lot but it’s not true in reality. Pep and Klopp rotate more than anyone. Having deep benches allow you to do that. Clubs with shallower benches are forced to play their best XI more often.

        • Bozzetyp@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is actually only partly true, city has one of the smaller squads - though oep rotates alot in his “17” outfield squad

            • Bozzetyp@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That I agree with, but remeber that quality also allows you to use players like akanji, rico, stephen very often

            • kucharssim@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is a really important point that people often do not consider.

              One thing is to rotate with a squad that is made up of players of lower quality than your starting XI, another thing is to rotate when you have a 100m player on the bench.

              Sure you can choose to rotate to protect your players, but it’s perfectly understandable that coaches that are first and foremost judged by results are reluctant to do that if rotation means likely dropping more points during the season.

      • Greaves624@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jose whined about Europa being 2 days ahead of the Derby only to play most of his starters into the ground and refuse to sub anyone out, or give them rest. Proceeded to do absolutely nothing in either games

    • boi1da1296@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah? Well I’m a genius and have a rebuttal for every single one of your points:

      too many games.

      They’re being paid lots of money to kick a ball, they should be happy they even get to play at all.

      not enough rotation because every player is expensive so you’re not going to rotate out your 100m man when every game is must win.

      Why should they be rotated when they earn 100m every week? My boss doesn’t rotate me at my office job.

      players are getting more athletic so more forces put into the ground at higher speeds and shorter ground contact times.

      They’re being paid to be fit? What’s the problem here?

      time off between seasons are way too short. pre seasons are way too short. 4 week preseason to go from sedentary to game speed is nowhere near enough.

      When my grandad worked the coal mines, do you think they cared if he had a break? These millionaire diva crybabies that I invest hundreds of hours watching every year need to think of the common person.

      generally very mediocre strength and conditioning. which clubs can get away with because you can just buy a healthy player, buy a fast player etc instead of revamping your physical development systems

      Maybe they can take the 200m they earn every week and spend it on a trainer that’s actually good at their job!

      Makes me sick seeing all the defenders of these overpaid footballers. They get paid more than most will see in their lifetimes, clearly their bodies are different from the rest of ours.

  • Kreygasm2233@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Too many games, high intensity football, lack of proper rotations

    And its only going to get worse next year because of the new format for European competitions

    • stangerlpass@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hogh intensity football is an underrated aspect imo. 5 sears ago most of the lesser teams would play low blocks and sit back. Today almost every team plays a high press but not all the players are built for it.

      • Blue_winged_yoshi@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And 10 early 2000s small teams didn’t even play low blocks just generically bad football with a bit of defence, bit of attack no tactical fouls and big sides would play bottom half clubs in cruise control.

        The game is better for smaller clubs being significantly more capable, it’s one change I wouldn’t want to undo at all, but something has to give and tournaments should not be expanding at all as a bare minimum. It’s getting worse not better

        • MICOTINATE@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          something has to give

          I think 15% more things have given this year compared to previous years

  • matthewjames1991@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The level of premier league, cup and European games is relatively the same. However, the level of needless international friendliest, shoe-horned winter world cups and pointless nations league tournaments is ridiculous. Glad Harry Kane at least gets a winter break before the Euros.

    • TheHabro@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry how is a player playing for league and UCL in the same week different from playing in two international games in a week?

      • UuusernameWith4Us@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This argument is basically:

        Players playing in games I like to watch is ok, players playing in games I don’t like to watch is bad.

  • LongDongSilver911@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Players don’t even get proper summer rests because the clubs are desperate to get them playing all across the globe for exposure during those time periods.

  • jc_calwood@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has VAR also played some role here? I can imagine having 1-2 minute pauses several times a game can make you cool off pretty quickly and your muscles become more injury prone. I believe that’s actually what happened to van de Ven in the Tottenham - Chelsea game for example

    • moonski@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Van De Ven did not do his hamstring just because of a VAR pause. If the pauses were an issue you’d see it all the time in Rugby, which you don’t…

      • washag@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’d also see the field become a casualty ward after half time in every game.

  • TheHabro@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always find it interesting how people here always complain how nation team managers always play their best players for their qualification games (8-10 games spread over 2 years) and disregard how clubs don’t rotate the same players in over 50 games per year.

    • NoCapital3@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is that clubs cannot sign and register new players outside of the transfer window.

      If the squad is riddled with injuries, the club will have to work with what they have until the transfer window reopens. In short, their choice and ability to rotate players are restricted to multiple constrains such as injuries, timing, money etc

      The NT has none of these constrains (for the international break). They can call up whichever best and fit squad available. If they feel like player A is gassed or not in a good shape, they can easily call up player B before the break starts. They don’t have to sign player B for X amount of money, they just need to add him to the call up list. In short, NT can rotate players easier.

    • Theumaz@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also disregard how their club probably goes to the USA, back to England and finish in East-Asia in preseason, playing up to 8 full games in preseason.

    • tbrakef@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Barca had a god like teenager who played 72 games in one season for club and country… Since that season he has missed 40% of the games with injury…

      Barca had a god like teenager who play 90% of the minutes for club and country. He recently tore in ACL and meniscus, in a low priority international match which nearly all other players were rotated.

    • qu1x0t1cZ@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure when the Nations League was first announced UEFA said that it would eventually replace Euros qualifiers. Probably changed their minds in favour of more cash.

      As an aside I hate how big the Euros has become. When I was a kid it was 16 teams representing most of the top 20 international teams in the world. Short tournament, high quality, good fun. Now it’s too diluted.

      • moonski@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The euros was peak at 16. Almost no dead rubbers even in the groups, just a quality tournament all round.

        • juve_merda@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          16 team euros was brutal, 1 bad game in he group and you could be out

          now it just has a ton of filler, which on one hand is nice for the smaller nations that wouldn’t get to compete otherwise, but it always means some low stakes games

    • Nahcep@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technically you could make them different, let’s say one in a classic format and one closer to current Champions’ League with League A being the main qualification route - it would still keep the challenge between low-rated teams while keeping the tournament finals in the other

      Right now they are redundant, yeah

    • valhalla_jordan@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This could definitely just be year-on-year variance. There could also be more sensitivity from the medical teams towards minor injuries.

      This is one of those things that everyone looks at and attributes whatever they hate about the game as the cause. But we don’t have enough evidence to make definitive claims about causal relationships in regards to injuries.

  • CDO_6@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    these things are never just one cause. style of play is the driver - high intensity for 90+ minutes.