• MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      China is part of Taiwan.

      Or more precisely, PRC is rebelled provinces of China.

      • FuglyTheBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hello from Taiwan, while your heart’s in the right place this meme actually plays into China’s hands as it fits their one-china narrative. Taiwan considers itself an independent nation and hopes the wider international community will begin treating it as such.

        • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Last time I heard you still officially maintain your claims to mainland China, Mongolia and part of Russia and India.

          Also, I wouldnt say his heart is in the right place. PRC is the direct result of the faliure of the KMT junta and its widespread terror.

          Either “China” only ever hurt mainland. Taiwan is a democracy that circumstantially became viable and manageable (even then, it took decades) on an island with the population of 20 million people.

          I agree with your sentiment that Taiwan is probably better off by itself. Nobody actually knows how to manage mainland properly.

      • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        acknowledging the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China

        The US “acknowledges China’s position” on Taiwan, but carefully avoids an explicit official stance on Taiwanese sovereignty.

        • lorty@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t acknowledge Taiwan “sovereignty” because they support the claim that the legitimate government of all of China is the one in Taiwan.

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, they do not.

            Their de facto stance is that the Taiwanese government is sovereign over the island, but they formally accept that the PRC is the government of China.

            It’s a careful line between ensuring the continued de facto independence of their key ally, without inducing the inevitable temper tantrum from China of formally treating them as independent.

        • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I wonder if the US also “acknowledges UKs position” on the Falklands or straight up supports them because they’re in bed together

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Arent the Falklands largely populated b people of British descent? Also I just skimmed the wiki article and while Argentina did attempt to settle the islands in the early 1800s, that was over 200 years ago and the island has been held decently well by the British since.

            Plus I doubt the Falklanders want to be part of the shitshow that is Argentina, the UK may be a mess but they usually let their random islands do their own thing.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              There was a referendum on the subject and apparently only one person on the entire Island voted to be Argentinian, and he had an Argentinian wife so possibly a biased opinion.

              It was obviously a secret vote but given the fact that he was the only one that ever said anything pro Argentinian, it was pretty easy to work out.

              Both countries might have right wing nationalist governments but at least the UK’s government is incompetent and is therefore unlikely to be a major threat to your liberty.

          • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Who the fuck cares about official claims? I guess the war in Ukraine is about denazifying since that’s the official statement :)

            Realistically though, official claims are diplomatic UN roleplay and actions are what matters; the US states that Taiwan is not independent but arms the absolute cock out of what they claim is ch*na.

              • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                I didn’t specify which claim it was, I pointed out how hollow and contextual those claims are.

                Is Taiwan claiming to be independent in the chambers of the UN? No.

                Does it act, and is it acted upon as if it was independent? Yes.

                Am I a cop? No.

                Am I the cop who arrested your mom in her bed chamber last night after she confessed to have been real naughty? Yes.

                It’s fascinating to see someone come across nuance for the first time.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Tankies are baned Russia, apparently they are subversive. It seems that no one likes them very much.

  • yokonzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank god this list isn’t any larger, it’s amazing more governments haven’t tried to ban this tool that ensures people’s freedoms

    • Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is, a VPN isn’t just some magic tool that lets you view location-restricted content and hides your IP address. It’s a relatively basic networking concept.

      Essentially, it allows you to connect two or more local networks, i.e. LANs, as if they were one big LAN.
      In particular, that means no firewalls in the way, no weird NAT behaviour, no need to deal with public IP addresses and so on.
      And it secures the whole communication with encryption + implements a form of authentication, so that you can leave the individual services within the VPN relatively unsecured (assuming you don’t separately expose them outside the LAN/VPN).

      Or more concretely, my dayjob uses a VPN for the whole home office thing. And I’ve used VPNs plenty times just as a networking tool in my software developer job. Prohibiting the entire concept of VPNs makes many software solutions impossible or annoying to build, and will cause folks to expose insecure services to the internet.

      • satans_crackpipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please stop. VPN + TLS is essential. VPN does not mean you’re automatically L2 bridged with a local segment. Changing source headers because your exit gateway is somewhere else does not hide IPs in any way. Many consumer level protocols have original source IPs in the payload.

        • Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I was talking about the networking concept of a VPN. If you use a VPN to connect into a foreign country, where you then make a web request from that remote LAN to some questionable webpages, you absolutely do want TLS for that connection. But that’s separate from the VPN concept.

          I don’t know much about the consumer-grade services, but I have heard that lots of them are actually just proxies, not proper VPNs, which I guess, is what you’re talking about. With a proper VPN, you initiate the web request, using an IP address in the range of the remote LAN that you’re connected to. Therefore, fiddling with the headers is not necessary, in that case.

          Ultimately, my point is that proper VPNs can do everything the consumer-grade stuff does, so for an effective ban, you would need to prohibit them, too, which is where lots of organizations/companies will be strongly opposed.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The UK government tried to restrict VPN usage (not that they ever explained what restrict meant in that scenario) but as with most stupid things that the UK government says, everyone just ignored them and then it didn’t happen.

      I suspect somebody with two brain cells to rub together explain to them the process and since it sounded complicated they gave up with it.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe Australia tried to ban encryption. Not just VPNs, but all encryption. Like, bruh good luck with that. Source: trust me bro (im an Australian and therefore too lazy to figure out if this is hyperbole or not)

  • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just to make it clear, the VPN restriction in Turkey is not enforced, nor hindered. Of course it was put in place as a form of restriction against people’s protest organization via Twitter back in 2013 during the Gezi Park protests, but it is not enforced (at least widely, if at all). Even the leading opposition party has an official support for a VPN under their name.

    Nevertheless, as far as the map’s intent goes, it is an indicator of a dictatorship.

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pictures of playing cards on websites get entire subnets blocked for gambling in Turkey, so I’m surprised to learn they don’t enforce rules against VPNs.

      • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        explain.

        turkey is just terrible. arresting tourists over the most simple thing, stupid eedo wife kissing tiny ppl thinking they are children, geocide against armenians and kurds…

        go tell me…what NOT to hate about turkey. small dick energy country like “oooh we wann be called turkyie or bharat but not turkey coz we so weak our finance minister has sex with presidents relatives…”

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hey look, it’s the bad guys!

    EDIT: Not sure why OP downvoted me unless he’s a bootlicking authoritarian piece of shit.

    • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t speak for most of these places but I’m pretty doubtful in general.

      I have no idea what it means for VPNs to be restricted in Turkey for example… I use them almost every day. Personal, self hosted, commercial, corporate… Both using them while I’m in Turkey to get information from the outside and when I’m outside trying to get information from the inside.

      I’ve never had any issue using them. Like literally ever.

      • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://protonvpn.com/blog/are-vpns-illegal/

        In 2016, the Erdogan regime began blocking VPN services and Tor. Now Turkey is using deep packet inspection techniques, similar to China, to detect and block VPN and Tor traffic. 

        The use of a VPN connection in Turkey can also mark you out as a person of interest for law enforcement. Despite this, VPN usage in Turkey is quite widespread. 

        The website Turkey Blocks monitors internet censorship in Turkey.

    • loxdogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      you can’t use VPN were endpoint is used read censored materials. If it’s within the country, than OK

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    you copy pasted this from reddit

    it had no sources

    it is wrong

    you are a very bad person

    no one on Lemmy is disputing this map

    you are all also bad