• 5 Posts
  • 11.9K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 7th, 2025

help-circle









  • If you can publish, get grants, bring money and prestige to your university or department, you are rewarded. Its hard to find wrong doing, easy to turn a blind eye, or difficulty holding people accountable in the system as it exists because of these pressures and how the process actually works.

    that’s how it worked before 2025. now the NIH has dried up. And it was never about “prestige”, NIH grants come with institutional overheads that used to fund the university. A $2M NIH grant could have overheads of an additional $2M to the institution, and the salaries of researchers came out of these grants, which is unique to the US system.





  • .The number of papers indexed in the databases Scopus and Web of Science, for example, has recently been increasing exponentially, at a rate of 5.6 percent per year. By one estimate, researchers around the globe are devoting a collective 15,000 years of work to peer review every year—work that, if paid, would cost $1.5 billion for the share done in the US alone. Increasingly, researchers are finding it hard to donate that kind of time.

    Thankfully, Donald Trump defunded all science so this is no longer an issue.

    “I struggle like anything to get peer reviewers,” said Haseeb Irfanullah, who is on the editorial board of Wiley’s Learned Publishing

    Wiley is worth US$2.8B and pays exactly $0.00 for reviews. I get US$500/hr consulting to Wall street. Listening to publishers whine about unpaid labor is tedious. You want my expert opinion? PAY.