Did you mean “had to pay secret amounts of cash”? Because Newsmax is paying here, not getting.

Just like a large number of people consider moving out of the country after presidential elections. Few are serious about it.

How do you figure? If the DRM depends on them, doesn’t that give them the power to destroy it?

Yeah. They’ll get unemployment though, right? Since they’re being laid off, they should qualify for unemployment. They’re in California, so they should get benefits.

You really shouldn’t be surprised about losing health insurance either, since in the US it’s tied to your job. I assume, it being CA, that they’ll have some form of medicaid for unemployed people as well.

How dare journalists be compensated for their labor!

That’s the thing, though, it’s not a loophole. It’s intentional. It makes a good headline, but it doesn’t really do much.

Much like California’s other good-sounding laws, the fine print is what gets you on both ends, both in the law and in the EULA you agree to when signing up that’s going to say that all transactions are explicitly a terminable and revocable license.

Costco doesn’t have discounted pricing, do they? They just have the one membership price, right? I’ve never shopped there so I don’t know.

There’s enough to make a list?!

This. I have a carry license. I don’t even carry because I don’t go into dangerous situations like that, and if I somehow found myself in one anyway, I’d let them take my phone, wallet, car, whatever. Those things are insured and can be replaced. I can’t think of a situation where being armed would help me. In close quarters, an attacker with a knife would win. At range, I can probably give up my stuff and run away.

Flat black.

A lot of people can’t get safe drinking water out of their tap. A lot of people, just in the US. That’s a lot of ongoing costs for filters. Where there’s municipal water, that water should already be safe to drink.

Which places have a “discount with card” program that also don’t/didn’t sell at full retail price?

Maybe just “humans”?

The weirdest one I found was a site that would only check to see if what you entered started with the correct password. So if your password was hunter2 and you tried hunter246, it would let you in.

Which means not only were they storing the password, but they had to go out of their way to use the wrong kind of string comparison.

There’s no finding out here, at least not yet.

ClamAV is great for exactly one thing: checking the “has antivirus” checkbox on company security audits.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s a real AV product, but there’s no real need for it. You’ll get much better results just being careful about what you run and having a system and network firewall. And not running everything as root.

Are they wrong? They’ve been moderately successful so far.

I think that means we’re not learning.

Mine is the null string. They’ll never guess it!