• Jeff_Banks_Monkey@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Carolina making a HC switch during Bryce Young’s already sub par 1at year is definitely going to make watching his development that much interesting.

    Also The chargers are cursed to have a above average QB but always find a way to lose games

  • blazingpelt@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Top couple names aren’t surprising, but the tier right below them has a few interesting ones

    • triplec787@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That middle section is the one that’s wild to me. Goff, Russ (less surprising), Mahomes, Tua, Lamar, and Burrow are all downright bad in losses. Goes to show how much impact they have on the roster as a whole.

      • notmyplantaccount@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ones with only 3 losses don’t have much of a sample size for this chart so one bad game will skew it. Mahomes almost certainly all comes from the Broncos game, which was his worst EPA ever in a start.

      • LeonidasSpacemanMD@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder if it’s partially because (for example) a guy like Mahomes will frequently find a way to scratch out wins even if he doesn’t play great for part of the game, and so if they lose it is sometimes because he made some huge uncharacteristic mistakes or whatever

        Like herbert and Allen are good QBs who just keep losing in all kinds of situations this year, good play or not. It kinda takes and particularly subpar performance for Mahomes or tua to lose the way those teams have been playing

  • IdyllicGod22@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stroud and Love as the best QBs per play when losing is incredibly interesting. And people say Love can’t play, smh.

  • dellscreenshot@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah Purdy has been pretty good in losses outside of the cleveland game. And even then they had a chance to win.

  • Quirky-Lawyer-3409@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This should really be scaled in some way. EPA per play in losses, or average EPA per loss or something. This skews the data heavily against QBs whose teams have lost a lot. Granted, Mac Jones is terrible regardless, but the perspective is screwed up by using total EPA in losses.

    • IWasRightOnce@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well yes, but also no.

      A QB can play good (or at least produce a positive EPA) and their team can still lose.

      So while losing more games will make a QBs sample size larger, that doesn’t automatically mean he will be lower on this chart.

      Obviously these are extreme examples, but NE only has two more losses than LAC.