They can still use (and improve) wlroots… The idea that every DE needs to create its own Wayland server is non-sense… GNOME and KDE implementing it themselves makes a bit more sense given they’re the biggest ones…
I don’t think there ever will be a bspwm on Wayland, this issue about moving to Wayland has been stuck for almost 10 years now. I doubt the dev is going to move to Wayland anytime soon at this point. I guess I’ll just move to another WM once I buy an AMD card.
no, because they can probably use xwayland rootful mode. The real problem will be as applications (or their dependent libraries) start dropping x11 support. That’s probably still a bit away though.
Will this kill off desktop environments without the resources to make the switch?
They can still use (and improve) wlroots… The idea that every DE needs to create its own Wayland server is non-sense… GNOME and KDE implementing it themselves makes a bit more sense given they’re the biggest ones…
And because GNOME and KDE do wayland implementation before wlroots
r/bspwm will probably die. Such a shame, I love this window manager so much
hyprland takes a lot of ideas from bspwm
FVWM didn’t have plans to do something similar for/on Wayland, a couple of years ago, at least.
I don’t think there ever will be a bspwm on Wayland, this issue about moving to Wayland has been stuck for almost 10 years now. I doubt the dev is going to move to Wayland anytime soon at this point. I guess I’ll just move to another WM once I buy an AMD card.
no, because they can probably use xwayland rootful mode. The real problem will be as applications (or their dependent libraries) start dropping x11 support. That’s probably still a bit away though.