• rubpoll [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    If your goal is to prevent deaths, surrendering would have been the ideal yeah.

    Zelenksy tried to surrender to prevent further deaths, and Boris Johnson refused to let that meeting happen because NATO isn’t finished using Ukranians as crash test dummies.

    • GivingEuropeASpook [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      If your goal is to prevent deaths, surrendering would have been the ideal yeah.

      This has literally never been true in any war ever. Foreign occupations rarely tend to be bloodless and I doubt a Russian one would have been an exception. At no point were any of the peace talks about Ukraine’s surrender – only renouncing it’s NATO ambitions in exchange for the withdrawal of Russian troops, as per:

      https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022/05/06/boris-johnson-pressured-zelenskyy-ditch-peace-talks-russia-ukrainian-paper

      “In the weeks ahead of Johnson’s April 9 visit, high-level diplomatic talks held in Belarus and Turkey had failed to yield a diplomatic breakthrough, though reports in mid-March indicated that Russian and Ukrainian delegations “made significant progress” toward a 15-point peace deal that would involve Ukraine renouncing its NATO ambitions in exchange for the withdrawal of Moscow’s troops.”

      At no point was surrender on the table - that would have likely lead to Zelenksy’s detention and execution in the early days of the invasion.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        I don’t think Zelensky was too keen on capitulating to Vladimir Putin’s demands to destroy his country, after sending in GRU hit squads to kill him and his family multiple times at the outset of the war.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      Zelenskyy tried to surrender and Boris Johnson stopped him?! Ooooookay… He maaaybe (all “unnamed” sources) expressed an opinion, which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

      To cast that as “Ukraine was stopped from surrendering” is just obscene … and yet another Kremlin talking point.

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 年前

        which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

        If the UK is convinced that you can’t negotiate with dictators, how does the UK keep entering into arms sales agreements with Saudi Arabia? Do the contracts just appear out of thin air at BAE?

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          Sigh.

          I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries. We had plenty of relations with Russia before they decided to invade Ukraine and they were a dictatorship before. We have plenty of relationships with China now and they are a de facto dictatorship.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            88
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            The Saudis used their British weapons to bomb Yemen and create one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in recent memory. The UK sold weapons to Saudi before, during, and after the Saudi involvement in Yemen.

            Perhaps Russia should have merely bombed Ukraine to the point of starvation. Then they’d be a good dictatorship that the UK would be happy to carry out business negotiations with.

            • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              73
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 年前

              Don’t be ridiculous

              Ukrainians are white

              That’s only acceptable when it’s brown, asian, or south american people who’s country you’re destroying.

              • Duży Szef [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                33
                ·
                1 年前

                Temporarily white mind you. They will be presented as unwashed asiatic slavic hordes soon enough by the western press, unfortunately.

                Such trends and anti-ukranian xenophobia are already strongly devolping in Poland.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 年前

              What’s going on in Yemen is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Saudi Arabia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Saudi is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            58
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 年前

            I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries

            Yemen isn’t a country because it isn’t white enough for you

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        1 年前

        Russia and Ukraine may have agreed on a tentative deal to end the war in April, according to a recent piece in Foreign Affairs.

        “Russian and Ukrainian negotiators appeared to have tentatively agreed on the outlines of a negotiated interim settlement,” wrote Fiona Hill and Angela Stent. “Russia would withdraw to its position on February 23, when it controlled part of the Donbas region and all of Crimea, and in exchange, Ukraine would promise not to seek NATO membership and instead receive security guarantees from a number of countries.”

        The news highlights the impact of former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s efforts to stop negotiations, as journalist Branko Marcetic noted on Twitter. The decision to scuttle the deal coincided with Johnson’s April visit to Kyiv, during which he reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to break off talks with Russia for two key reasons: Putin cannot be negotiated with, and the West isn’t ready for the war to end.

        Foreign Affairs is a Kremlin propaganda outlet now?