• BigTwerp@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you cherry pick a badly run upgrade to a run-down hospital in the middle of a city as an example then of course the numbers will be high. If (like me) you choose a badly needed community hospital in a more remote and deprived area then £30m is easily enough.

    I don’t want a penny of my taxes going on these particular elections since it is a massive waste and your flawed logic isn’t going to convince me otherwise.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Cherry pick? I gave a real life example. You’re making up numbers out of thin air to try and, what, prevent the democratic process?

      But okay, let’s go for this again. You’ve now stipulated remote and deprived. Let’s try a primary school this time though. How much could that really cost?

      Well, turns out it’s £18 million in a remote coastal town that has known poverty for the majority of its existence.

      https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/6059680/new-fraserburgh-primary-school/

      63 - 18 = 45

      So £45 million left to create 2 new hospitals? 10% of the real life example that you’ve dismissed just because it proved you wrong. So 5% of a real life example, per hospital.

      Aye, sure, awa and bile yer heed yi ignorant twerp.