This is a very insightful article. One thing that I noticed which I haven’t really seen discussed or have myself considered before that gets mentioned near the end and which I think probably merits its own consideration:
Evolutionary psychologists proved particularly useful in legitimizing Epstein’s grooming, trafficking and raping of girls and young women, and in return he provided support for the Ivy League academics in this field in the form of huge research grants and new buildings. This circle of money and prestige proved irresistible to many, especially at a time when research funding is being reduced all over the world, but there was more to it than that.
With all the cuts to government research funding, these kinds of incentives only give the Epstein class further leverage over the direction of research and further privilege their chosen researchers. I do not believe that to be a coincidence.
Really, the whole thing (America, …so far) is compromised past the point of return.
We know we can’t trust anything anymore but no one seems to have the heart to be honest about it.
If you are watching the world play out, it seems our intelligence agencies and the other nations they have agreements with, are all compromised. It seems as though they are the real ones, in combination with the Epstein class/mafias that own America (and soon the world if not already).
I’m overwhelmed with connections that are like conspiracy that seems to be more truthful than the truth they tell us. It’s starting to look like many of these crazy conspiracies hold truth. And the most obvious one is QAnon. QAnon being purposely made and laced with nonsense for the dark reality to hide behind. And it’s it’s looking like gangstalking and Havana syndrome is another that’s starting to come to light. And in both cases CIA and intelligence agencies, and organized crime are involved.
History aligns with it all too… Like psychology starting to be heavily used in the 1930s in both promoting specific lifestyle paths and politics. Past before that recent stuff, espatology shows us these “illuminati” groups, freemason’s, Catholics, and Jewish, and all the extremes of their epatology make the world’s wars make sense… As batshit as that seems…
I like to look at reality like a coin spinning. When the coin gets close to stopping, when it’s spinning the table right before the final collapse, its audible vibrations speed up. It’s like we are at that time and we are getting so much information and coincidental truth coming to light… It’s like we are at the point where the coin is going to stop… And I don’t know what that means for our reality if the metaphor is correct.
Right now it feels like energy with continue to build up till war brings back a forced peace. Not because some group won, but because the whole game will just implode on itself.
deleted by creator
Epstein is the fall guy in a cesspool of corrupted people. His whole thing was fucked up, the trafficking etc… but arguably equally fucked and darker is the way this cesspool of people own massive portions and the path of the human species. And that’s why Epstein is the fall guy, because that fact is trying to hide behind the trafficking scandle. What’s [arguably] sicker then raping a life and putting it out of its misery by a quick death? Limiting the entirety of a human life to live for a life path created by them and their psycho partners and calling it “Freedom”.
We fund them still. We grow the beast. We give meaning to the monster machine they made. THAT is why Epstein is the fall guy and what’s hiding behind the marketed drama of his actions. …a whole pool of these evil people owning everything we know to be truth. Epstein’s own legal issues are being used as a distraction. (even though they they are a serious issue.)
The files show that in 2007 he [Stephen Pinker] was consulted by Epstein’s lawyer (as “one of the world’s leading experts on grammar”), “to analyze the statute” of a law which criminalizes contact with minors for the purpose of sexual exploitation. When this emerged, during Epstein’s 2019 court case, Pinker claimed he didn’t realize it was for the defense of Epstein, but it is difficult to imagine what he might have thought his advice was to be used for — did he think his verdict, that the “sole rational reading” of the statute was that “communication must be the vehicle through which the persuading or enticing directly occurs,” was in defense of the “enticed” girls? It seems unlikely.
Very enlightening, thank you. This is my new favorite magazine.
Democrats btw.
