• Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are too stupid to buy a smaller car. Media tells them that bigger = safety and luxury, and that’s all they need to know. Just look at how many people scream “the grid isn’t ready”, “they don’t work in the cold”, and “the batteries cause slavery” about EVs because they heard it in a tik tok once.

    Fewer car is the ideal solution but the people who will loose their cars are the ones with the least lifestyle choices, they don’t commute by choice. There will never be a lack of rich pricks to buy white Audi/BMW/Merc suvs.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You might be right, but it would be a good motivator to have people pay the true cost of big heavy cars — including the negative externalities to health, safety, road wear, parking, and pollution. Drivers don’t currently pay those costs, which means we essentially subsidize big heavy cars now. If we stopped doing that, Canadians would act more like consumers in the rest of the world.

      Also, strong agree on fewer cars being the ideal solution. In fact, fewer cars is a mathematical necessity. We can’t electrify ourselves out of terrible land use, e.g. the oceans of parking lots, crumbling roads, and inefficient highways that contribute to carbon emissions and environmental degradation.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the negative externalities to health, safety,

        see: Car Insurance Costs

        road wear,

        you’re thinking a Road Tax like the UK? That’s coming; but I’ll only vote on it if it pays MoT AND MoT takes over a completely-public mass-transit

        parking,

        User-fees

        and pollution.

        E car; but I can get behind a levy on car insurance through our publicly-managed consolidated regional single-base-insurer, for Internal Combustion Engine cars.

        Drivers don’t currently pay those costs,

        It seems the only thing missing is the road tax; and that’s just because they’re in love with their volatile user fees for transit despite the near-collapse of CEO bonuses during the pandemic.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Car insurance only covers a small number of externalities. It does not cover tire particle pollution (tires are the number one source of microplastics in the world), air exhaust pollution, noise pollution, etc etc. Even if they never got into accidents, cars would remain one of the most hazardous things to our health. Cars are also the number one killer of children, by far, and insurance doesn’t bring them back to life.

          Agreed that a road tax is a good start. But a road tax wouldn’t cover the fact that bigger cars cause MUCH more of all these harms than smaller cars, so externalities remain.