• LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biggest problem is that they cheap out on the tech parts. Nobody complains that an iPad has a touch screen, cause it works. But an appliance tends to have a crappy UI, running on a crappy touch screen, powered by a crappy CPU.

    If they just used quality parts, it’d probably be fine, and the only issue would be expensive replacement for an entire assembly, instead of small, cheap parts that can be fixed.

    • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A smartphone or tablet screen has the function to have multiple buttons and responsive functions on one and the same place.

      A kitchen appliance doesn’t have or need that. Absolutely no need for digital or so-called “smart” gimmicks.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah! Instead of having a knob my idiot stove has “touch areas” - good luck cooking if you’re blind.

        At my old place, if I wanted to set the bottom left plate to the hottest setting, I’d put my hand on the leftmost knob and turn counter-clockwise until it snapped once.

        On this thing I usually have to start with turning off the child lock. We never turn it on, but every time we wipe off the stove there’s a like 95% chance the child lock activates due to the lingering moisture.

        After turning the child lock off you have to hold the power “zone.” Then you have to select which burner by holding its zone - if you don’t you’ll start changing the timer when you hold down the - button to cycle from 0 to keep warm, to 9, and then press + to turn it from 9 to boost.

        I’m legit not joking. Mind you this example is when the piece of shit behaves. I’ve an absentmindedly placed lids on the off “button” before and had the piece of junk refuse to turn back on for half an hour.

        What does the touch controls add to my experience other than frustration? A knob doesn’t activate from water splashes. A knob doesn’t turn from residual moisture from a slightly damp cloth. A knob is tactile and pleasing to hold, and can be used by anyone of appropriate age, even if they’re blind.

        Four knobs could pull the weight that these NINE touch “buttons” fucking struggle with.

        • IMongoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Holy shit, I could not imagine someone who cooks a lot to put up with that. If you have a few things you need to start and stop at specific times and change heat levels and stuff while cooking several things at once… it takes me .5 seconds to operate my dials when doing this. I would be livid using your stove.

          • Dojan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah it drives me bonkers every time I have to use it.

            It’s worse than that too because I grew up with gas and electric hot plates. I’ve 20 years of ingrained habit causing me to move pots and pans off the plate to quickly adjust temperature. I’ve legit lost count of the amount of times I’ve absent-mindedly pulled a hot pan over the controls causing the stove to become unusable for a while.

            These are the most sensitive touch controls I’ve ever experienced. They’re triggered by moisture and even putting pans or groceries on them.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh ffs what a fucked up convoluted mess.

          We need to find the engineer that designed this, and their managers who pushed it, and shame them People of Walmart style.

          How is it people can willingly violate fundamental UI/UX rules?

          As mentioned, how do these things pass Accessibility regs?