• thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    The amount of bonus a worker gets is based on the number of miles they complete each month.

    I understand what they’re trying to do, but this is just not equitable. You’d have to figure out how to handle this for people who cannot run (such as wheelchair users). This greatly favours those with more free time and less obligations (such as people with no kids). It favours those already in shape and those who have fewer health issues.

    This will favour those who already have it better off, which is the opposite of equity.

    Good idea in theory, but I don’t like the model where it’s applied based on output.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is the good part in theory? I can’t see how what/how much exercise, if a person chooses/is able to do it at all, is relevant to their job? Especially in a company that makes paper??

      If employers want their employees to be happier and healthier they need to pay them better (for their work, not for whatever unrelated and out of hours activity they decide to “reward”) and give them more time off, anything else is profit seeking bullshit.