fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 days agoGottemmander.xyzimagemessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down11
arrow-up142arrow-down1imageGottemmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squareEtterra@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 days agoYeah but it only works at the subatomic level.
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoNope, the Aussies quantum entangled whole atoms, and were able to do a Bell test on objects with rest mass. It’s news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pp9n5QwVgu4
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoThis is just plain false. There is no theoretical size limit to unobserved quantum systems, although it is practically hard to achieve large ones. the largest ones we’ve managed are over 100 atoms. https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoActually, they managed to see the effect with a 114 atoms molecules
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoThere are no particles, there are only waves Macrodoses LSD to make it also work with baseballs
Yeah but it only works at the subatomic level.
Nope, the Aussies quantum entangled whole atoms, and were able to do a Bell test on objects with rest mass. It’s news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pp9n5QwVgu4
This is just plain false.
There is no theoretical size limit to unobserved quantum systems, although it is practically hard to achieve large ones.
the largest ones we’ve managed are over 100 atoms. https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html
Actually, they managed to see the effect with a 114 atoms molecules
There are no particles, there are only waves
Macrodoses LSD to make it also work with baseballs