With previous Rexit’s like the API debarcle etc. many users were left looking for an alternative, but with decision fatigue and bad UX etc. most did not find the Fediverse a viable option.

What needs to still improve, how can we be ready this time?

  • Barbuzie@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a new user (I started using PieFed 2 months ago), the UX can surely be improved, but I feel like the main issue is relative to how users are supposed to use the fediverse: I still don’t have a clue on how the fediverse works and how to use it properly.
    And I’m motivated in learning to use it.
    But for someone who isn’t motivated, it’s a huge “no thanks, goodbye”

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      it’s weird that, because once you’re in it’s basically seamless. it’s just that first step of picking a server based on your interests that trips people up, because aren’t you supposed to pick interests after you get in? more national instances would probably solve that, i think, so you can just go to your local one.

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think we should just hide all of that complexity and just set defaults for everything that the user can decide to change if they want. You don’t have to understand how the Fediverse works to be able to use it. Most people don’t understand how email works, they just use it.

      BlueSky has 40+ million users, and it’s also technically decentralized like the Fediverse.

      aka. you can use the eurosky.social or bluesky.social server etc.