• Slatlun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    236
    ·
    1 year ago

    ‘252 km (157 miles) range’ to save others the same skimming I did

        • indigomirage@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          63
          ·
          1 year ago

          The key is that with the right use case, it frees up lithium to be used where only it is suitable.

          (for my needs I’d be fine with sodium…)

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can see that. My point is that the only electric car that has that range in the U.S. is the Leaf, which goes 168 miles on the smaller battery. I don’t need an electric car that goes that many miles between charges. I’d be fine with 90. I’d probably be fine with less than 90. We have a second car if we ever want to leave town. I’d ditch my hybrid and get a cheaper electric car that didn’t have a huge range, but it isn’t even on offer.

            • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Dude get a used Leaf or Bolt. There is a $4k tax credit or direct price reduction for used now.

              • ramble81@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Got any info on that? Looking at buying out my EV lease and wonder if I can get that added.

            • indigomirage@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              For sure! I think we’re going to have to move away from a one-size fits all car design. For general city use, I use a Chevy Bolt, but for longer (infrequent) runs, I’m still stuck with ICE (I’d use a hybrid if I had one). In Canada, the range really does go down in the winter. (and Canada has not taken charging infrastructure very seriously - mandatory for adoption)

              Anyway you look at it, these are very, very positive developments.

              • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                They are as expensive as the other EVs and aren’t eligible for the US reimbursement 🫤

                They are kinda ugly too… Which sucks because I really love the BMW driving experience

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              My problem is that I need >100 mile range. I live in a cold climate and have a 50 mile, round-trip commute (and high speed, so even worse range), so if EVs get half the range in the winter, I could stuck. There isn’t a big set of cars in the 100-150 mile range, usually you get something older and used with <100, or current cars get >200 and you pay the price for it.

              A new Leaf is something like $30k, and used Leafs are something like $17k, so it’s absolutely not worth replacing my reliable hybrid car at that price. If I could get a new car around $20k with ~150 mile range, or a used car (~5 years old) with 100-150 mile range for 10k, I’d probably buy it. But that just isn’t a thing right now. So I’m waiting.

    • tills13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve found people vastly overstated how much range they need. 99% of usage is in the city between home and somewhere else. 250km is perfect if the price is right.

      • Sestren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For daily use, sure - but it completely excludes itself as an option for road trips in the US and parts of Canada. There’s a stretch of interstate road near me with nearly a 100 mile gap between service stations.

        I know that this isn’t the purpose of this battery, but it’s a valid reason why a lot of people might be hesitant to buy one. Many people can’t afford multiple vehicles for different purposes. You have the car you drive to work with, and if you happen to go on a trip you just use the same thing.

        Maybe 99% of use occurs within constraints that this battery can handle, but if you can only afford one vehicle, then this is still a pretty suboptimal option. That being said… it could still be cheap enough to not matter. I didn’t see any mention of price in that article.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If 99% is covered by this then cover your last 1% by renting a vehicle has that ever occurred to you ?

          • MethodicalSpark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree with your logic. It makes perfect sense to rent a vehicle for edge cases.

            However, I disagree that you’re going to encourage mass adoption by asking people to change their lifestyle. A large amount of the US population views their vehicle as more than a tool to get to and from work. It’s an extension of their personality. Road trips might be part of that personality.

            They’re sold on the marketing ideals of luxury, comfort, or adventure. They buy accessories for these vehicles like roof-racks for their luggage or campers/trailers to help them travel across the country while keeping that comfort of home. Tens of thousands of campers are still sold in the U.S. every year and EV’s are a nonstarter for towing more than 75 miles.

            No one enjoys renting an unfamiliar Honda CR-V where the seat doesn’t feel quite right for long periods of time, there’s something sticky on the shift handle, the previous driver smoked in it, and you hear a plastic creaking sound coming from the back seat. You can’t quite figure out from where and it’s driving you insane.

            Until EV’s can match the convenience and capability of ICE vehicles, adoption is going to be limited.

            • kameecoding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If we can’t convince people that we need to change habits then we are doomed anyway, switching to BE cars is not a viable solution we need to increase public transportation and cycling anyway

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              average american has two vehicles. Its literally not even a lifestyle change: one EV, one hybrid or gas vehicle will cover 100% of normal use cases. EVs have lower maintenance costs and longer predicted life spans and don’t waste as much energy in stop and go traffic. They are superior commuter vehicles.

              The problem is vehicle fleets. Trucks and busses will be hard to replace effectively and they mostly need longer discharge cycles and ranges.

          • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not how car sales work. People want EVs without major downsides. Until that’s what’s available we won’t be see EVs surpass 10% market share.

            • ExLisper@linux.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know, people are not willing to comprises for the good of the planet. That’s why we’re so fucked.

              • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                They should raise the driving age to 30. Then people would understand what a privilege driving really is.

        • krakenx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          A solution to this would be an extra expansion battery that you could buy or rent as an add-on only when needed.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            …or rent a vehicle with the fuel savings from driving your EV most of the year, and skip putting a couple thousand km on your car over a long weekend.

          • GreenM@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            or don’t buy city car for intercity trips. Get li-ion powered cars or wait for them to make model with bigger range.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just use Communauto for those once a quarter out of town trips.

        • GreenM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It seems to me that car in the article is relatively small city car. I can imagine that building bigger car with inter city travels in mind would also include an improved range.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly. We have two cars, and we only need one to have any kind of range. The other is fine with 250km/150mi range, but it needs to be relatively inexpensive to buy and repair. It’ll just be for a daily commute and around-town driving, no expectation for long-distance.

        It doesn’t need space for people or stuff, just 2-4 passengers is plenty. It’ll strictly be for commutes and small trips to the grocery store and whatnot, the other car can be used for larger trips.

      • Deiv@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        5-8k for a car in this day and age? That’s the price of a scooter

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Ami starts for substantially more than that.

            And even then, it’s not legally classified as a car. It has virtually no crash safety, a top speed of 28mph assuming no incline, and a real world range of 40 miles.

            Don’t get me wrong, I like the Ami, but it’s a scooter alternative more than a car alternative.

        • chitak166@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who ever said brand new?

          Might want to brush up on your reading comprehension, ‘mate’.

          • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a post about a new vehicle, when you talk about “buying one” it’s clearly inferred you’re buying from the factory.

            Also, there’s no need to be a complete dick. It’s not a good look for you

            • chitak166@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, it’s not inferred at all. The vast majority of people buying cars buy them used.

              You’re just desperate to justify your assumption.