With the advent of dictator Donald Trump and his dangerously unstable, violent, egomaniacal personality, the resistance from civic society has not risen to the deadly challenge either quantitatively or qualitatively.
My point is if you believe the US is incapable of electing a woman candidate (which is what the people who claim, falsely, that Harris lost because of sexism are doing), then isn’t nominating a woman candidate choosing to lose the election?
There is definitely a part of sexism in it, who knows in what proportion. But the problem in its whole is making that choice, and the list of reasons why is very long. Obviously including only the reasons that were known before the election.
haha they didn’t choose a woman, they chose Harris.
Because she is qualified for the job.
The job was to win the election. Which she failed to do, completely.
You know I meant qualified to be president, find an argument.
And this wasn’t the point, the voters are the ones responsible for the result of the election and all its repercussions.
I was just saying she was objectively the better choice.
The candidate is not supposed to win elections?
Given the Democrats avoided a primary in 2024, claiming it’s the fault of the voters is especially ironic.
So your point is that the US isn’t a democracy?
My point is if you believe the US is incapable of electing a woman candidate (which is what the people who claim, falsely, that Harris lost because of sexism are doing), then isn’t nominating a woman candidate choosing to lose the election?
There is definitely a part of sexism in it, who knows in what proportion. But the problem in its whole is making that choice, and the list of reasons why is very long. Obviously including only the reasons that were known before the election.