• alavar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sorry, why are we operating under the assumption that apartments=rentals? It’s not a given at all, even taking into consideration that there is quite a lot of systems where you are not renting from private landlords but from the city/cooperative

      • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve always heard that apartments are what you rent, and condos are what you buy. Besides, if the Republicans are on board, it’s because they see a path to fleece the little guy out of even more money.

        • alavar@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          I just got educated that it’s cultural differences - it’s perfectly normal to own an apartment where I come from (Poland)

    • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nah, apartments are supposed to be great. For one you can buy and own apartments.

      Renting is supposed to be a viable alternative to houses. The tradeoff is supposed to be slightly more expensive, but no worries about any kind of maintenance, and higher flexibility about moving.

      The reason this whole equation is so fucked is because we don’t have enough apartments (really all housing) to house everyone where they want to live, so purchasing or renting housing is obscenely expensive.

      And the main problem stems from zoning