• raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The “precise and specific actions” called for in that article, specifically for the purpose of combating speech that encourages violence, like homophobia or white supremacy:

      • Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.

      • Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.

      • Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

      • Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.

      What’s your problem here?

      • KickMe@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

        This, because it’s a fucking web browser, and it can be weaponized for bad while pretending to be good.

          • KickMe@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why can’t a browser company just be opinionated about making the best browser? Why does it have to have a shitty controversial opinion about social media? I don’t know why, but my trust in the org and therefore the browser itself is gone.

            • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t think being anti white supremacy and homophobia is shitty or controversial. Why would an Internet company write an article about something that affects the biggest sector of the Internet, social media? 🤔
              “No they should stay in their lane and only talk about, I don’t know, CSS or something.” I don’t buy it.

              • KickMe@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Who said anything about white supremacy or homophobia?

                Regardless, yes, they should refrain from controversial subjects that are not related to their business. And if they decide to make social media censorship their business in a direct way, also fuck em.

                • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  …the article you linked me? The topic of this discussion?

                  It shouldn’t be controversial to anyone. The suggestions given there are pretty mild. Regardless, justice is not the absence of conflict. Sorry the article made you upset but that doesn’t make it wrong.

                  • KickMe@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t give a damn about the article. I only stated my reasons why Firefox and Chrome are total deal breakers for me. Maybe there’s a better browser than all of them, but for now I’m happy with Brave.

                    And your opinion is your opinion, it isn’t universal. Stop thinking that it is.