• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, because “can’t hold a demonstration in one office building” is precisely the same as “no citizen right to petition their representative”.

    Are you just picking bits you think you can argue against and ignoring everything else? What’s the point of that?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “can’t hold a demonstration in one office building” is precisely the same as “no citizen right to petition their representative”.

      When you’re locked out from your rep, you have no legal mechanism to get their attention

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Again, you’re reducing not being able to protest inside a specific office building to not being able to communicate with them, see them, or protest them.

        Considering you seem to be basing this off of, generously, a few instances of people being arrested for protesting inside congressional offices with no context for how many people do communicate with their representative, and you’re arguing against “people should be able to talk to their representative, and the problem is people with more influence than their individual vote”, I’m honestly not sure what your point is. It doesn’t seem like you disagree with what the word means.