I’m surprised that ny times is being objective towards this administration
But that only leaves 5 of 6 sentences for attacking women and minorities! That’s not very DOGE. Hopefully they can work attacks on women and minorities into their fellatio.
What an inefficient way to run a government. They should really fix such egregious government waste.
They drained the swamp, sold the water, and refilled it with piss.
Pfft, it’s the most efficient way, because prez is so good at, uh, presidenting. The best some say. /s
Only one out of six? I figure these guys spend nearly all of their time making sure that the Pumpkinhead feels properly glazed.
All that asskissing must lead to sore lips
Buy stock in Chapstick, it’s the MAGA way.
Bootlickers
anyone who has had an dark triad parent knows that game
They should do a comparative analysis next. We need to know if America is falling behind its competitors like North Korea and Eritrea.
-barf-
I recall a WaPo article about how intelligence briefings needed to have Trump’s name on every page in order for them to be read.
That was Trump 1. I’d be amazed if they even bother with security briefings most of the time now. It’s way, way worse.
No need for a security briefing when the great trump has saved us from any and all calamities that could possibly befall us. Gas prices? Down. Retail prices? Down. World wars? None. Regional wars? None. Citizens and humans in the US? All rights in tact.
I proffered that we should Truman show Trump. It’s not like he’d know the difference.
True except gas prices are not down. We just shouldn’t care about them because he doesnt.
Let’s, just for for a second, pretend that the praise and bashing is justified. Why is not ineffective to spend over 16% of the time on that?
Mmm dingleberry
And both sides same!
