• SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is so stupid. Why would a company put this much effort to lock down the seat controls, as if they didn’t already exist without limits on every other car? Not even with a toggle? These companies are really trying to destroy the “cars = freedom” association.

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the motors need to cool down, they need to rethink their motors.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Motors get hot and it’s quite reasonable to not include tons of cooling just so that you can adjust your seat for hours on end.

          That said the implementation is still stupid as time isn’t the right measure to judge motor temperature, motor temperature is. Thermocouples cost fractions of a cent, the motors probably already include one or two as they already have smarts (being hooked up to the CAN bus and not straight voltage). Which would also take care of differing environmental temperatures as obviously the motors are worse at shedding heat when it’s scorching hot in the car.

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Rethink a motor designed to be used for 5 mins initially then occasionally in future? It’s fine for the design purpose. It’s even fine for the mode where it operates every time you get in the car (where it waits in fully back position, and moves forward when you operate a control)

          Why should they think it to let it be used as a fidget toy?