• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not anti-EV crowd, just anti-Elon. I hate him as much as anyone else but people just throw absolutely any rationale out the window when it comes to anything he’s involved with (especially around here).

    I’ve seen several leftists at this point straight up turn their backs on EVs and literally start parroting conservative propaganda about them. So sad.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you are leftist you should be anti-ev. All EVs do is propagate car-centric social development which is a cancer to any potentially better world.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Disagree. EVs only environmental advantage is tail-pipe emissions. But they are significantly worse for society then tail-pipe emissions are. Being heavier damages the road more, and causes more tire and brake wear. Proprietary batteries mean that they are thrown away more often then gas cars. More limited range means that more car infrastrucutre is required to support them.

          At the end of the day, the limited-taxes we have in the US that discourage driving, EVs are allowed to side-step, so from a societal point of view, EVs are absolutely worse in everyway (except trivial tail-pipe emissions). If you are a leftist who has to drive a car, an EV wouldn’t even be a viable option. You’d be better off in a hybrid.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            EVs only environmental advantage is tail-pipe emissions.

            Thank you for making my point. That’s exactly the type of conservative parroting I was referring to and it’s absolutely not true. Good job 👍

            • belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Have you read about the actual environmental costs and material extraction needed for electric cars? EVs are about saving the auto industry when gas runs out. Not about saving the environment.

              The conservative parroting usually takes a sliver of truth and runs with it while tacking on other bullshit to make it seem legit. The “anything to own the libs” is part of that dogma, but pushing a con is easier with a twisted truth to lead the bigger lies.

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              It literally is though. They are worse in every single other way including the people that defend them.

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              You are the dumbest person I’ve seen post today.

              re: nazi salute, you don’t understand the purpose of the legislation, it has nothing to do with “nazis,” it’s purpose is to silence dissent, the nazi excuse is so sheeple like you support it unconditionally.

              Similar to EVs. Their purpose is to ensure car development can continue and idiots like you don’t realize that the problem with cars has nothing to do with what powers them. Why do you think you live 60km away from work with no public transit? Because cars force you to.