• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    This is fantastic if it means companies can switch to inexpensive ads that can be cobbled together by somebody’s kids, and ditch their multi-million dollar ad budgets that just make everything cost more.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        That is definitely a major factor, it’s just not the only one. People seem to believe the world operates like a comic book with designated villains do all the bad things and everybody else is just a victim. Individual behavior is also a factor. I mean what’s the dominant gospel on Boomers - that they irresponsibly polluted the Earth and wasted all the resources, or that they were innocent victims of a few evil billionaires?

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Interesting - the idea that rich people weren’t taking advantage of everybody else all through history until they just started uniquely victimizing the current generation seems mind-bogglingly unaware tbh.

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The difference is that it used to be harder to concentrate massive wealth in the hands on one individual. It used to require very large companies, which were controlled by multiple people through shares and board positions. Companies themselves weren’t allowed to grow too massive or achieve monopolies.

              Lately all checks have gone out the window which has resulted in single individuals having control over mind-boggling amounts of resources. This changes the dynamics a lot because an individual will act very differently from a large board or shareholders.

              • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Depends on what you mean by “recently”. Think Rockefeller, Getty, Rothschild, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Morgan… all the classic mega-wealthy families were built around companies with one man at the top, who made or approved all major decisions and either owned the company outright or had a dominant majority share. That didn’t really change until around the 1930s. Modern corporate structure with distributed participation made it possible to get extremely wealthy without starting or inheriting your own company.