(Please no trolling. Respect Rule #1)

  • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    So, so much.

    But we all like to start with a father, a mother, and two sons.

    Who populate the world.

    Not awkward at all.

    • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      As much as them being the only people alive at that point is up for debate, Adam and Eve did have other children according to Genesis 5:4. Better, but still not great.

    • Terevos@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well strictly speaking, Adam and Eve had a lot more children than just the three mentioned in the bible.

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I had not read that. Well, I guess siblings making out and breeding, then mating with those offspring, and mating with their mother, and father, etc… makes it all better.

        • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s pretty clear from the Bible that there were people not of Adam’s lineage. “Sons of men” vs. “sons of God.”

        • Terevos@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well. Not really too different than evolution’s answer in that respect.

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Out of interest, if there are other children, that are not mentioned in the bible, then how did we find out about them?