• grte@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I imagine they do realize that but then follow that thought up with, “So why are we continuing with this…?”

      • grte@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That seems to back up what I said? 51 percent, a majority, don’t see any reason to continue on with what they see as an outdated institution.

          • grte@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We have to get rid of it because it’s entirely unjustifiable that a ‘royal’ family exists regardless of the actual power that they wield. We’ve long moved past the concept of divine right of kings, there is no ethical basis for this institution. Those are the grounds on which it must be got rid of. That they are powerless money sucks that do nothing for us is just the cherry on top.

      • vrojak@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        51 per cent, agreed with the statement that […] “we have to get rid of it.” In comparison, 33 per cent said the monarchy is an important part of the country’s history.

        What kind of polling is this? It is not a contradictory standpoint to both say that something is an important part of a countries history, and it should be removed anyways.

    • Splitdipless@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because a warplane has an ejection seat doesn’t mean you HAVE to use it. It’s just a pretty good option in some cases in order to save the pilot.