• JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    There was literally a European Council meeting in the mid-90s simply to thrash out the question of the name. Because there were other more imaginative proposals: florin, shilling, and of course ecu. But they went with euro, the lowest possible common denominator which offended nobody. I remember thinking what a terrible missed opportunity that was. I still think that.

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I appreciate the sheer gumption. They should have doubled down and just called it “money”. Plural “moneys”. How much is it? Seven moneys.

      Actually, now that I think about it I know at least two countries that arguably already do that, so… you know what? Euro is dumber. Love it.

      • Flag@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        But that, explicitly with ‘money’ is english cultural imperialism. Would never be accepted in france etc.

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Could always just have defaulted to whatever the word for “money” is on that language, all at once. Go nuts. I mean, once calling it “Euro” is on the table there are no bad ideas anymore.