Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    11 months ago

    Argee to disagree and time will tell, but you must see there are factors that haven’t existed before in the history of humanity.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      Who knows how the laws will change because of AI. But as the law currently stands it’s just a matter of proving it to a court. That’s the main barrier.

      This is strong evidence an AI is breaking the law.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        11 months ago

        That joker could have been somebodys avatar picture with matching username.

        A.I. can’t understand copyright and useful A.I can’t be build by protecting it from every material somebody thinks is their IP. It needs to learn to understand humans and needs human material to do so. Shitload of it. Who’s up for some manual filtering?

        If we go by NYTimes standards we better mothball the entire AI endeavor.

        • Ross_audio@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          11 months ago

          That’s why it’s a massive legal fight.

          They’ll delay a ruling as long as possible.

          They’re definitely developing a new model on vetted public domain data as we speak. They just need to delay legal action long enough to get that new model to launch.

          This is the same thing YouTube did. Delay all copyright claims in court, blaming users, then put their copyright claim system in place that massively advantages IP owners.