• Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    17 days ago

    “AI” for one is not a thing. Secondly there is no way some magic technowizardry is going to solve all our problems. This is pure liberal idealism. Also it’s not even a novel concept. We have had cybersyn for like 50+ years. “AI” is just a buzzword and you all (by proxy) shilling for these grift companies is pathetic.

    • davel@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      “AI” for one is not a thing.

      If you want to be pedantic about “intelligence,” then that’s true, but not relevant.

      Secondly there is no way some magic technowizardry is going to solve all our problems.

      No one said it is.

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        If you want to be pedantic about “intelligence,” then that’s true, but not relevant

        I think it is relevant insofar as using “AI” to refer to a particular set of, fairly different, technologies is vaporware nonsense. We should define what we’re referring to. The machine learning technologies that can help doctors detect cancers are much more socially beneficial than the misinformation slop machines that your search engine is becoming.