• NamedUser@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    TLDR: Article seems shady. Article claims she doesnt support solar at all, one of the linked references ironically shows her supporting solar, instantly debunking articles own claims…

    This article needs more scrutiny than the bare minimum i could provide. Its well written in the way it presents its logic, ill give it that. ——- After giving it a thorough read, theres something off about this article.

    It rightfully makes an attempt to make a sketical case about fasulo and shows that she was a Q follower, but that shouldnt make anyone close the book and view her as guilty.

    The article it doesnt seem to use anything thats current which supports the writers claim that shes against solar.

    In fact the writer claims that Fasulo does not support solar at all but the very same reference piece to her website shows Fasulo in support of “smart solar” as she describes putting solar on buildings, freeways, parking lots, anything that seems to already be in place and to spare farmland or forests.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Which is to say she doesn’t support any utility-scale solar, which is necessary if we are going to stop burning fossil fuels