If you base your argument on fan-fiction then there is little point in discussing this further 🤷
The safty regulations were put into place because they proved to be necessary due to serious (and costly to repair) construction defects found in all of those reactors that were put up in such a short time. And not a single operator of a nuclear power plant will ever pay for the storage costs of the nuclear waste, because as with fossile fuels that is almost entirely externalized to the society at large and future generations.
“Fan fiction.” I’m the only one who provided sources. Fucking idiot…
They are literally paying for their waste. Look at the satellite view of a reactor. You can see the casks usually. No, there are not negative externalities involved. There’s no radiation leakage and there’s no danger posed. Almost no one has been harmed by a nuclear reactor, and even the disasters there was more damage done by evacuation than the actual radiation.
You’re the one living in a make-believe world here. You’ve made zero verifiable claims so far. Presumably why is because, as soon as you do, you’ll be fact checked and proven wrong. You’re making yourself look silly while insulting me. Please, make a claim that can be checked or fuck off. You’re making everyone dumber.
![[Discussion] Are you pro or anti nuclear energy? Why?](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/f1dcd9bc-51f8-4d82-ba04-9c34a26ea389.webp){kind=link}
If you base your argument on fan-fiction then there is little point in discussing this further 🤷
The safty regulations were put into place because they proved to be necessary due to serious (and costly to repair) construction defects found in all of those reactors that were put up in such a short time. And not a single operator of a nuclear power plant will ever pay for the storage costs of the nuclear waste, because as with fossile fuels that is almost entirely externalized to the society at large and future generations.
“Fan fiction.” I’m the only one who provided sources. Fucking idiot…
They are literally paying for their waste. Look at the satellite view of a reactor. You can see the casks usually. No, there are not negative externalities involved. There’s no radiation leakage and there’s no danger posed. Almost no one has been harmed by a nuclear reactor, and even the disasters there was more damage done by evacuation than the actual radiation.
You’re the one living in a make-believe world here. You’ve made zero verifiable claims so far. Presumably why is because, as soon as you do, you’ll be fact checked and proven wrong. You’re making yourself look silly while insulting me. Please, make a claim that can be checked or fuck off. You’re making everyone dumber.