• 7u5k3n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    This saying / idea sprang out of folks losing content they “bought” via online platforms.

    Basically the letter from Sony(?) Said that due to licensing rights content was going to be removed from their servers… and that the items you bought were no longer available.

    So… essentially nothing on a digital platform is ever purchased . It’s just leased until the platform owners decide to alter the deal. And such, if you can’t actually buy it… Are you actually pirating it?

    • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Licensed, specifically a unilaterally revocable and non transferable licence to view personally. Leasing implies recurring payments, and some areas allow lease assignments and other consumer protections that aren’t afforded to licensing.

      • Specal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Renting implies reoccurring payment, leasing just means “agreement to use X under Y conditions”. Example A: A device leases an IP address from a router. Example B: You rent a movie from blockbuster.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, you are actually pirating it lol.

      Removal/revocation without violation of terms of service is bogus, but you enjoy a product without contributing a share of the cost to develop or keep developing. Getting gouged is absolutely aggravating and consumers are being taken advantage of, but we all have the option of not buying.

      I can also see reasonable situations for removing content, but not “just because” and certainly not indefinitely for everyone.

      • 7u5k3n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Idk man… I feel like if I pay ~$40 for a digital item… I should have the same rights with it as the physical copy.
        If a digital market place sells me the item… I should be able to return to that market place and redownload it. Basically once they sell it… they are obligated to host the files.

        Or as an alternative … I get 1 download of a drm free product. And everything after that is rebuy.

        This sell it for $40 and then it’s gone off your game system or out of your account I think is shit business practice.

        Streaming services can do what they want with their content… because you’re paying x money a month to access it… that’s the assumed behavior. Digital products advertised as “buy it on digital” should behave as items purchased and owned by the end user.

        Maybe that’s just me being pro consumer…

        • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I feel like if I pay ~$40 for a digital item… I should have the same rights with it as the physical copy.

          That’s the whole problem - you don’t. Your feelings are irrelevant. If you want that, you need to demand it, and refuse to do business with those who will not provide it. Of course they won’t, so just stop buying digital copies, keep physical media alive.

          • 7u5k3n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            so just stop buying digital copies, keep physical media alive.

            That’s the only way forward honestly.

            We have to return to physical media. Tho I fear it’s too late.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you can’t find one then skip the game or accept the fact that you might lose access to it. That’s the way the creator decided their game would be distributed, if you disagree you’re treating them as slaves by getting the fruit of their labour without compensating them and without their agreement.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If you disagree with the original terms, i.e. the game is available on a platform with DRM, then just don’t get it and completion to the devs. Our pirate it but don’t pretend that you’re morally right to do it.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Nah. DRM in its current version is morally wrong. Circumventing it is perfectly fine. It’s essentially an industry wide price collusion, which I’ll note is illegal, but will never be broken up because the US antitrust agencies have been hollowed out to nothing.

                    In the same vein, if an employer refuses to pay you for time worked, your chances of recovering that pay is slim. In that circumstance, I would say taking the amount you are owed from the till is perfectly fine, morally. You would probably disagree, because you’re a boot licker and believe that whatever the law says is morally good. I understand the concept in abstract, but I will fundamentally never be able to put myself in the head space of someone like you.