Another CEO for mozilla. Good or bad news?

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hard to say. You kind of want someone that was part of a successful product. And successful for-profit products are almost always menaces.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, but hiring someone who’s good at making for-profit “services” successful generally means you want your product to be for-profit.

      And as you say, successful for-profit companies are often menaces.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t really disagree, but what do you want as an organization, someone that built a “good” product that nobody ever used and fell into obscurity? Or someone that built a product that attracted and retained millions of users that you might consider “bad”? And tbh, most of the “bad” from these products is just because of their size and monopoly, which would arguably be a good problem to have for Mozilla.

        Probably an easy choice if I was on the board.

        Also, not that it matters to our discussion but just as a minor correction, the new CEO is a woman.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Airbnb actually provides a useful service, unlike PayPal which only extracts fees

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Didn’t say that, I’m comparing companies that do nothing useful to companies that do something useful

                  • iopq@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Air bnb is not evil, it’s people exchanging services for money. They just resolve disputes, show reviews, etc.

                    The difference with PayPal is that they are not in any business, so they can’t necessarily resolve disputes other than relating to the payment itself. But the credit card issuer has exactly the same job, so PayPal is an extraneous intermediary

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Giving an avenue for rich development companies to snatch up properties they can short-term rent to rich travelers is a useful service?

            • Zorque@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Assuning thats normally for hotels and such, not as easily, no. AirBnB’s specific purpose is to remove barriers of entry for hosting people in your property. Initially that meant renting one of your rooms to a traveler on the cheap. Now it means companies that would otherwise have to jump through tons of regulatory hoops to put their properties on booking sites.

              Not to mention… even if its the same, then its the same and still not a useful service, yeah? It’s just another booking service. Which, coincidentally, mostly extracts fees.