Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 month agoPeople only hate ai because they have access to it. If it were too expensive for the common folk it would be seen as luxurious or elite.message-squaremessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1100file-text
arrow-up1-95arrow-down1message-squarePeople only hate ai because they have access to it. If it were too expensive for the common folk it would be seen as luxurious or elite.Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 month agomessage-square48linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoLoss leaders are a thing. The problem is the ai companies don’t have the high margin alternative products to offset the losses.
minus-squareXaphanos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 month agoWe most certainly do. Pharma work pays big, for example.
minus-squarefake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month agoDo pharma need LLM chuds though?
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoSounds like a problem for ai companies to solve unless your concern is their success or larger economical impacts. Not a real critique of the technology itself.
Loss leaders are a thing. The problem is the ai companies don’t have the high margin alternative products to offset the losses.
We most certainly do. Pharma work pays big, for example.
Do pharma need LLM chuds though?
Sounds like a problem for ai companies to solve unless your concern is their success or larger economical impacts. Not a real critique of the technology itself.