witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comimagemessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down130
arrow-up129arrow-down1imageSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comwitchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoDisturbing for having their slogan as, “the search engine that doesn’t know anything about you” I guess they meant, “doesn’t know anything about you… Yet”
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThey need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found. I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoNo doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.
deleted by creator
Disturbing for having their slogan as, “the search engine that doesn’t know anything about you”
I guess they meant, “doesn’t know anything about you… Yet”
They need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found.
I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
No doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.