Next time just say “You’re dumb” rather than beat around the bush; be concise, don’t be passive-aggressive.
Here’s why you don’t appear to know what “misogyny” means:
You defend the suspicion of misogyny by stating you don’t care about her, which is mostly irrelevant but arguably slight proof against you; the latter because it could be you don’t care about her because she’s a woman, but you haven’t revealed that (yet).
You know how many men I don’t concern myself with? I am fiercely egalitarian.
I am not saying I wish harm to anyone. But what makes this person more special than the 25 million Ukranians who died from systemic starvation. The millions who died from the AIDS pandemic, which was mishandled.
Why should I care about some random woman when I have homeless people in front of me? I help those people.
Wtf are you doing to better her life and why should you care? Instead, you are accusing me of sexism, which in turn, is only detrimental to my life. Self-reflect.
You were. Unless you’d like to elaborate on what you meant by “… I don’t think you know what ‘think’ means.”
I am not saying I wish harm to anyone. But what makes this person more special than the 25 million Ukranians who died from systemic starvation. The millions who died from the AIDS pandemic, which was mishandled.
Who said she’s more special than any of them? I can’t tell if you’re attempting a straw-man or a red herring.
Wtf are you doing to better her life and why should you care? Instead, you are accusing me of sexism, which in turn, is only detrimental to my life. Self-reflect.
You don’t have to better someone’s life to not call them a “cum dumpster.” The bar is on the floor for this and you are digging underneath it.
Nope what? Who asked a question?
Nope there was no misogyny? Cool, same page.
You did:
Then I ignored the rant that followed because it was waste.
rofl, I think you meant disregard. This is cheesing me out with your disdainful approach to basic communication.
You see, you accused me of misogyny over a person I don’t care about, and do not know why anyone cares about.
Rather than validating her, you attacked me, while pretending you were taking some sort of higher ground.
So damn funny!
I don’t think you know what “misogyny” means.
… I don’t think you know what “think” means.
Next time just say “You’re dumb” rather than beat around the bush; be concise, don’t be passive-aggressive.
Here’s why you don’t appear to know what “misogyny” means:
You defend the suspicion of misogyny by stating you don’t care about her, which is mostly irrelevant but arguably slight proof against you; the latter because it could be you don’t care about her because she’s a woman, but you haven’t revealed that (yet).
I am not being passive aggressive.
You know how many men I don’t concern myself with? I am fiercely egalitarian.
I am not saying I wish harm to anyone. But what makes this person more special than the 25 million Ukranians who died from systemic starvation. The millions who died from the AIDS pandemic, which was mishandled.
Why should I care about some random woman when I have homeless people in front of me? I help those people.
Wtf are you doing to better her life and why should you care? Instead, you are accusing me of sexism, which in turn, is only detrimental to my life. Self-reflect.
You were. Unless you’d like to elaborate on what you meant by “… I don’t think you know what ‘think’ means.”
Who said she’s more special than any of them? I can’t tell if you’re attempting a straw-man or a red herring.
You don’t have to better someone’s life to not call them a “cum dumpster.” The bar is on the floor for this and you are digging underneath it.
What is passive aggressive about being a little creative with language?
And again, there is nothing misogynistic with that phrase: I can literally say it towards a man just the same.
Did you know that there are promiscuous homosexual men?
So agreeing to willful ignorance?
You do realize the definition of ignore, right?