• chaos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I really didn’t think I was being subtle here. I’m going to stop “just asking questions” and instead say that I’m surprised to see, in this of all threads, a sincere argument that there are some circumstances where it is okay for one ethnic group to systemically displace another, despite both groups only having that place to claim as a homeland.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      despite both groups only having that place to claim as a homeland.

      Your claim isn’t even close to the magnitude of their claim. They’ve been here for over ten thousand years. They. Own. This. Continent. And. Always. Will.

      And again, we displaced them. We are the colonizing class. I am calling for the reversing of what was done to them, which necessarily includes giving them back control over the land. I’m not saying they should displace anyone, but they alone have the choice.

      Instead of complaining that indigenous people don’t have the right to remove you, maybe you should focus on contributing to decolonization so they have a reason to let you stay.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      where it is okay for one ethnic group to systemically displace another

      Ah the old “reverse ethnic cleansing”… all you white supremacists are coming out to play.

      The absolute gall of westerners whose ancestors literally did ethnic cleansing, to then yell that at their victims at the hint of returning stolen land back to indigenous sovereignty.