And instead changing the time work and other things happens depending on where you are. Would be easier to arrange meetings across the globe. Same thing applies to summertime. You may start work earlier if you want, but dont change the clocks!

  • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    So You Want To Abolish Time Zones

    In a nutshell:

    Before abolishing time zones:

    I want to call my Uncle Steve in Melbourne. What time is it there?

    Google tells me it is currently 4:25am there.

    It’s probably best not to call right now.


    After abolishing time zones:

    I want to call my Uncle Steve in Melbourne. What time is it there?

    It is 04:25 (“four twenty-five”) there, same as it is here.

    Does that mean I can call him?

    I don’t know.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah it’s too bad that we can’t have the convenience of both, right?

        Hey, wait a minute…

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a situation where there are benefits to either option but one probably outweighs the other massively in frequency. I schedule many more international meetings and make many more international calls than the number of times I’ve needed a global event time. And that’s kinda saying something since I’m a space geek that looks for astronomical events, which are all UTC. It’s fewer steps to look up the distant current time and do the math from my current time for a passive event than it is to have everyone be UTC, then look up a distant wake time or business hours, then do math to figure out what the functional time is for something requiring human input.

        China is one universal time despite spanning from +5 to +9

        • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah but in your example, you wouldn’t need to look anything up either. You’re presumably very familiar with the offset of your time to their time? You’d also become familiar with their “universal time” versus your time. You’d just know what hours they’d be awake and asleep because you will have done the translation a few times.

          In addition, I - personally - would find it easier to memorize times in a single system: e.g. remembering that people in China are awake from 9pm to 8am is easier for me to remember. I typically already do this in my own head. I’ll convert times to my own local time and then memorize that. Do other people not do that? I find it much easier to look at my own clock and know if I can reach out to someone internationally.

          • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t know, I’m not seeing how that’s different. You’re remembering how your clock maps to other countries, I’m remembering UTC offsets. I feel like the main thing I’m actually seeing here is really a DST issue and remembering partial-hour offsets. Neither of those would go away with abolishing time zones

            • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s not that different. But you’re mentally mapping a UTC offset to your local time as well? Doesn’t that mean you have to do something like:

              1. Does this time work for me? (Map offset to my time)
              2. Does this time work for them? (Map offset to their time)

              Genuine question here. Seems like you’re doing twice the time-conversions when using UTC.

              • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                If UTC is being used, I’m only converting once. If a time is given in UTC, I only need to convert to my time. If I’m looking for a time at some place (and not just looking it up directly) then I’d combine the absolute values of the offsets before doing a time conversion. I wouldn’t say my 9am is 2pm UTC and 2pm UTC is their 4pm, I’d just do my 9am is their (9+5+2=) 4pm.

                Working with time zones makes it easier to keep times in your own perspective. You look up their offset and take a decent guess that their working hours match yours and you’d probably aim for something a little off from your start/end times and safely land towards the middle. To me, that sounds more reliable than hoping to find business hours posted without a distinct, clearly defined geographical divide in which you know the sun is going to shine there.

                I suppose that’s where the “simplicity” really comes from in my above points: time zones give you tables of information about times elsewhere, UTC-only requires a map and interpretation. Would places refine their day time shifts narrower than an hour? A minute? A second? Look at the central time zone in the USA. Columbus, Georgia is EST at -5. Ladonia, Alabama is -6 in CST, just across the state border. 1000 miles away, Seminole TX is on the other border of CST and Lovington, New Mexico is across the border in MST at -7. With time zones, the whole region from TX to AL agrees what an 8am start time is, despite effectively being offset by a whole hour, celestially. But solar noon is only at 12 for people in the middle, at the east border of TX, 500 miles between the two city pairs above. So if everyone goes to UTC, how do you know what a place uses as their schedule? Would Marshall, TX, stay at -6 while the GA/AL pair use -5.5 and the TX/NM pair use +6.5? That 8am local start time would become 1pm UTC for Marshall, 1230utc for ga/al, and 130utc for tx/nm pairs. Would Dallas, between Marshall and Seminole, be -5.78 and start the work day at 01:46:48pm utc? Way harder to track. Hence, the railroads gave us time zones

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Whether you realise it or not, there are two hours you are using here. Your local time that you suppose is automatically converted in your brain, and the international time that you can already use and is called UTC.

        Learn to use UTC, problem solved.

        Why do you want to create problems when there is a solution already?

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That time means nothing anymore. Time is something real, not a mere number that’s irrelevant to reality. Midday is the middle of the day and the zenith of the sun, or close enough. Midnight is the middle of the night. Etc. It doesn’t need to be exact, but it needs to mean something. In France for example 4PM is the name of the snack you eat that this time.

              • bouh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                Language is also a social construct.

                So, let’s put it this way. Let’s say you have this nonsensical idea of a unique timezone for the planet. We’ll base it on UTC for simplicity.

                You are in new York. It’s 1000. For you in new York, it’s the middle of night. You’ll wake up in a few hours. Your day usually goes about with wake up and work around 1400, lunch around 1800, end of work around 2200, sleep around 600. You can live you life with that. It’s merely a social construct. It’s completely stupid as a construct because it’s not setup for your actual day. The 0 means absolutely nothing. The 12 and the 24 neither. Why have a 24 hours clock for this? But a decimal clock would do nothing more.

                Now you need to work with someone in the UK. Can you talk to him right now? Who knows? You need to ask Internet about the time delay between where you live and where he lives. You learn it’s +6. Or -6. Who cares. Now you juggle with 2 times at your work: your usual one, and your colleague one. Congrats, you made a timezone again. When you need to know when he starts work, you do the maths : 1400-600=800. He must starts at 800, unless there’s some cultural differences.

                Now what you call 1800 is called 1200 for him. You made the same concept, the lunch time, have a different name depending on where you live, and that is after the translation.

                Why even have a time at this point. It’s more confusing than anything. Let’s just have minutes.

                You’ll have wakeup +200 for example. At wakeup +400, it’s midday. Midday +400 is the break. Break+400 is dinner. Dinner +400 is sleepy time. Now that would be much more sensible than your unified clock. There would still be problem with timezones interaction.

                But there’s nothing to do about timezones. It’s and effect of the spherical earth and general relativity. In physics, there is a clock for each and every position, and a delay between each. Most of the time it doesn’t matter, so you use your local time. But when it does, you do timezones. Because that’s how the world physically works.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              We already gave up the meaning of time when time zones where implemented. If it’s only going to be an approximation anyway then why bother with the added complexity of 230+ extra time zones?

              Y’all are just mad that “It’s 5 o’clock somewhere” wouldn’t make sense as a jokey excuse for day-drinking anymore. =3

              • bouh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                Timezones exist because that’s how time make sense everywhere.

                Je joke works because the earth is a sphere btw. It’s not a joke, it’s a fact. That’s the whole point.

                • hglman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  No, timezones don’t make sense everywhere, you clearly have not lived on the edge of timezones where the shift from what would be local time is notable.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      We could all just cover our windows, take Vitamin D supplements and actually all live on the UTC timezone.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        And let the brits enjoy UTC+0 like nothing happened while the rest of the word scrambles to adapt to the new time system? This is tyranny! I demand a new system where my region is the one with UTC+0 instead!

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Have UTC+0 run horizontally, instead.
          And increase its width to run from +80° to -80°.
          Squeeze the rest of the timezones into the poles

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No! In summer time we’d be a whole hour out of our natural time! It would be too much to handle.

      • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        You still need to convert in your head to “decide if usually awake at this time”. This solves nothing. Plus what if they’re somewhere unfamiliar on a trip?

        Meanwhile stuff like world time buddy or other locations on clocks are very accessible tools

        • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          The joke is that the whole world could go to sleep/wake up/work at the exact same time, day or night.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I lived in a tiny apartment with a streetlamp just outside my only window. Even with blackout curtains that room had no day/night cycle. I’m still trying to get back on a normal day/night cycle, fifteen years later.

        So, that’s another method you could try.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      In one of these stories you used Google and in the other you didn’t. Both of these problems are solveable with Google

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You already have to Google for what time it is in another part of the world, and Google can also tell you when sunup, solar noon, sundown, and midnight are in Melbourne, so it sounds like you aren’t any worse off without time zones.

      If you actually want to know if the sun is up somewhere else, then you want a world clock. At a glance visibility on the current position of the sun for every location on the globe, no time zones necessary.

    • Falcon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just add 11 to utc.

      No harder than having different times in different places.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I am too late. I knew this would be the top post, even though the arguments brought forth in the blog post are utterly stupid. I would even go so far as to say their arguments are presented in bad faith, because I refuse to believe the author actually thinks that’s how it would go. (They have some seriously awesome posts, I most highly recommend https://qntm.org/mmacevedo)

      With time zones:
      you Google what the timzone offset is (aka at which point in your local timezone the sun rises over there). Considering this sunrise time you then have to make a judgement if your uncle would be awake now.

      Without times zones: you Google at which time the sun rises over there. Considering this sunrise time you then have to make a judgement if your uncle would be awake now.

      It’s literally the same process.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ah yes, sunrise. That things that never ever changes depending on the time of year or location on the planet. Very dependable and memorizable thing, the sunrise.

        • hglman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, which makes the points, it’s non trivial to know when to contact people with timezones anyways. The time zone only adds more complexity.

          • ta_leadran_orm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think the point is that people’s routine isn’t tied to sunrise. For example, in the summertime I start work about 4 hours after sunrise, and in the winter I start work 20mins after sunrise. The difference would actually be more dramatic without daylight savings With timezones and modern internet you don’t need to look up the offset at all, you just look up the current time in that zone and decide if that’s an appropriate time to call. Speaking as someone who deals with timezones a fair bit, both in work and personal life. And as someone who understands the headache of dealing with them in international computer systems, the time zone system is a very nice compromise. Though daylight savings need to die

            • hglman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              If your start time has a 4 hour swing, how could you just look up your local time and make a choice to call?

        • Turun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Very dependable and memorizable thing, the sunrise.

          Uh, yeah? Because it defines your circadian rhythm?

          Ah yes, clock time. That things that never ever changes depending on the time of year or location on the planet. Very dependable and memorizable thing, the clock time.

          The arguments are exactly the same. It basically boils down to the philosophy if you want the daily life to be controlled by clocks or by the natural sleep/wake cycle of the body.
          Some prefer by the clock, because it provides a fixed constant, even if it may run counter to our very nature. You very well may prefer that. Others argue for a more natural sleep cycle, especially when it comes to school for example. Complaints about work starting too early are not exactly rare either.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Some prefer by the clock, because it provides a fixed constant

            Huh, you know what? I think you’re right.

    • hglman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just coordinate via asynchronous communication to schedule a time. It’s not 1935.

      You: “hey uncle text me when it would be a good time to have a call”

      6 hours later

      Uncle: “hey i just got up, lets have a call at 4:50”

      You: “thats a bid late for me, im in bed by 4:00, what about 3:30?”

      Uncle: “sure sounds great”

      No one needed to know anything about when people wake up, where on earth they live, etc.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Google tells me people are usually awake at 20:25 there.

      Problem solved. This actually makes it problem simpler. With different time zones:

      1. Get local time.
      2. Convert to target time.
      3. Decide if your uncle is usually awake at the target time.

      With one time zone:

      1. Get time.
      2. Decide if your uncle is usually awake at that time.
  • Cloudless ☼@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    We have GMT/UTC for that purpose.

    But do you want to see your clock at 02:00 and say “time to go to work”?

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Apart from feeling temporarily (ha!) weird at changing a habit, no. I prefer 02:00 no more or less than any other arbitrary number, really.

      • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Until you’re talking with someone from another country and you have no shared concept of time. Or you’re going abroad and you have to relearn what the numbers mean to fit the schedule. In the current system the numbers mean roughly the same in any country you visit.

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          What do you mean no shared concept of time. Just because the numbers are different doesn’t mean they don’t have time. Most of the time when telling stories people just say “the morning” anyways.

          you have to relearn what the numbers mean to fit the schedule

          Oh no, you have to remember like 2 numbers for wake up and going to bed? Or one offset to shift it? Different cultures already do things like start work at different times and eat dinner at different local times. So it will be no different than “people tend to eat dinner here around 19:00” then “people tend to eat dinner at 04:00 here”. Having relatively consistent local times may be able to give you a rough approximation, but so will just subtracting 9 hours or whatever the conversion happens to be.

          • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            But with such a system in place, what are we actually solving? If we’re agreeing on offsets (which would happen in a sane world), we’re just moving the information from one place to another. In both systems there is a concept of time zones, but it’s just the notation that’s different, which adds a whole new bunch of stuff to adapt to that’s goes very much against what is ingrained into society, without offering much in return. It’s basically saying “it’s 10:00 UTC, but I’m living in EST, so the local offset is -5 hours (most people are still asleep here)” [1]. Apart from the fact that you can already use that right now (add ISO 8601 notation to the mix while you’re at it), it doesn’t really change the complexity of having time zones, you just convey it differently.

            Literally the only benefit that I can come up with is that you can leave out the offset indicator (time zone) and still guarantee to be there at the agreed time. Right now you’d have to deduct the time zone from the context, which is not always possible. That doesn’t outweigh the host of new issues that we’d have to adapt to or work around in my opinion.

            [1] In practice we would probably call that 10:00 EST, which would be 10:00 UTC, but indicate the local offset.

            • kambusha@feddit.ch
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              You know, I was very much agreeing to OP, until your comment. You make a convincing point.

              I think we can all agree that daylight savings needs to die though.

            • kevincox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              The offsets would only be used for computer actions like “snooze until tomorrow” or configuring the default time that day/night mode switches. It would be a fairly rare occurrence. In day-to-day life people wouldn’t really think about that. Talking about times using consistent numbers would be incredibly valuable when communicating with people in different places which is becoming more and more common as our world becomes more connected. (How many people have a friend or family overseas? Probably the majority of people)

              Making the “default” way of thinking about time globally consistent would be amazing for communication.

              I agree that the incredibly painful transition wouldn’t be worth it. I just think that assuming we did make the transition, the end result would be better.

              • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                But then when you’re talking about 10:00 hours without specifying anything else, it actually means something completely different in the local context, apart from it being the exact same time globally. It doesn’t tell you whether it’s night or day at the other persons location. Your default point of reference in that system is the world, while even today, time is mostly used in a local context for most people. When I’m talking to someone abroad and I say “my cat woke me up at 5:00 in the morning”, I expect the other person to get the meaning of that, because the other person understands my local context.

                When planning meetings you’d have to now the offset either way, because I’m not going to meet at idiotic times if there is an overlap in working hours between the two countries, which is something that you’d have to look up regardless of the time system. And if I send out a digital invite to someone abroad, the time zone information is already encoded inside it, and it shows up correctly in the other person’s agenda without the need to use a global time. In that sense UTC already is the global time and the local context is already an offset to that in the current system. We just don’t use UTC in our daily language.

                But if it helps: I do agree that in an alternative universe the time system could’ve worked like that and it would have functioned. I just don’t see it as a better alternative. It’s the same complexity repackaged and with its own unique downsides.

                • kevincox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Yes, there is an offset somewhere, but the questions is what is more useful.

                  My main argument is that talking about global times is more convenient and more useful most of the time. Sure, if you are scheduling a meeting you still need to consider when the person is awake/working but that is no harder with global time and in fact can be much easier. But most importantly at the end it is very obvious what time you picked and if it works for everyone. If you say “let’s meet at 18:00” and I usually get to work at 19:00 that sets of red flags right away. If I agree to meet at 10:00 $city I need to do math to confirm that. Also I would much rather everyone just give me “working hours” in global time when trying to schedule across multiple people, rather than having to juggle working hours + time zones for each participant.

                  I think the concrete difference comes down to which of these properties is more important to you:

                  1. Agreeing on a time.
                  2. Knowing what time-of-day a particular timestamp is for a particular person.

                  Personally 1 is far more valuable to me. It seems that 2 is minor even now, but will be mostly solved by language as well. Sure, our current ability to approximate someone’s schedule probably won’t be perfectly matched even with new language. But it seems like the delta will not be enough to outweigh the benefits of 1.

                  “my cat woke me up at 5:00 in the morning”

                  Sure, that’s nice, but I’m sure language would quickly adapt. You can always say “very early” and I’m sure that we will get used to talking about local times more as this happens. As it is this still may not be that notable if I don’t know that you work night shifts. Languages would evolve and I don’t think it would be any worse, just different.

    • Pirky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think it would be better to think of it as, “Do we want everyone to have the same general idea of what 5pm means? Or to have everyone be on one time?”

      Edit: I know it’s an imperfect question as northern/southern latitudes can get dark sooner/later than the other pending the season. But 5pm to a Californian is going to feel very different than to a German if we’re all on one time.
      Those are just my thoughts, though.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      We’d get used to it. In China they only use one timezone across the whole country, and they just accept that daylight is at different times in the East versus the West

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        94% of the population of China lives in east of the heihe-tengchong line, which means that for 94% of the population the timezone is at most 1 hour off of the “true” time, which is pretty normal.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Half of Canada’s population lives in the Quebec-Windsor Corridor, but we still use like 7 separate time zones.

          Also that 6% you’re leaving out is more than twice Canada’s population.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Half of Canada’s population is less than the population of New York State. Y’all tiny. Maybe more people would live there if it wasn’t a frozen wasteland.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Months and seasons are much simpler because it’s always a 6 month offset rather than anywhere between 1-24 hours depending on location. It also doesn’t affect scheduling as much. If you’re interacting with someone on the other hemisphere, the outside weather generally doesn’t affect your decision in any meaningful way.

        • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah but somewhere between 87-90% of the population is in the northern hemisphere so for the vast majority December - March = Winter. Although I guess depending on local climate it might be more like dry vs rainy season, or not much difference between “winter” and “summer”.

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      UTC is most universal, as it’s kinda constant (by lack of/knowing a better word). GMT has DST, so that time changes twice a year, UTC is used as base for all timezones, no matter if and when they have DST.

      In the military Zulu is used as name for UTC.

    • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think if I had to wake up to the moon to write emails and make spreadsheets until sun up so my boss could read them in sunlight from their balcony I would cause dire problems.

        • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That seems even more useless, then, because if I wanted to contact someone elsewhere on the planet, I’d still have to check the local working hours vs the local time.

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              10 months ago

              So there will be no improvement by making a global change that needs everyone to agree to re-learn the systems they are already familiar with.

              • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                There will be an improvement of course. That kind of thinking is why the USA still uses imperial after 200 years of the metric system.

                • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  How? What’s improved? I still need to look up what the local working ours would be in a certain area I’m trying to call as 9-5 in what is currently EST would be 12-8 in PST. That’s pretty much the same as checking the time zone difference. What’s changed? It would also create regional specific timing. If I’m from North Carolina and I’m talking to someone from Sweden, the idea of “waking at four thirty in the goddamn morning” would need to be translated into a local understanding of what that means. I think this would create far more ambiguity than it would eliminate and I’m not sure what benefit comes from it.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s literally just a number and doesn’t make any tangible difference.

      • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        The trouble is that “2 AM” now means radically different things depending on where in the world you are, and you lose any ability to be able to intuitively reason about the time in other parts of the world from you.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          But now your talking about something else unrelated to what time you get up for work.

  • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a cool idea, but then you lose the local representation of the daylight cycle, which just complicates things again as you try to schedule things with people in other countries without knowing if it’s their bedtime or not.

    I play games with international friends and work with international colleagues, so I have my fair share of troubles with time zones. If anything, abolishing daylight savings worldwide would yield much better results.

    On a side note, when scheduling events on Discord, I like to add in a unix timestamp that shows everybody their local time. Quite convenient!

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a cool idea, but then you lose the local representation of the daylight cycle

      We already lost that with our 1-hour time zones and daylight savings. Clock time is no longer bound to solar time, and I think we’re overdue for the retirement of local time.

      Managing geographically-dispersed schedules on a single unified time standard isn’t any more complicated than trying to remember everyone’s time zones already is, and would likely reduce confusion overall since unlabeled timestamps would no longer be ambiguous.

      If some manager wants to shift their workers’ schedule to account for seasonal light availability? Then just fucking do that and don’t make everyone have to run around manually updating all the clocks.

      • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        True, but time zones offer a good compromise between solar time and globally-synchronized time.

        Having 12pm noon be approximately when the sun is highest in the sky is better than not at all, and still gives some form of regional cohesion in terms of timekeeping.

        There are pretty extreme examples, of course; China is one entire UTC+8 time zone, and that means Tibet is still dark when Shanghai is wide awake, which is dumb, and as annoying as the US’s 4 time zones is (not counting Alaska and Hawaii), it still makes regional sense.

        Fuck daylight savings time.

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Doing this would lose a sense of work vs home time for people. I have some coworkers on the other side of the world, I look at their time and know they shouldn’t be online anymore. I tell them things like “Go be with your family” or “Must be sleepy considering how late it is for you”.

    It gives me a sense of humanity to know if it’s 8pm their time, it’s way too late for them to be working. I’m sure I could adjust if we all used UTC but it would be so stupid to change.

    Also imagine hours for businesses all sounding weird as heck lol.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I tell them things like “Go be with your family” or “Must be sleepy considering how late it is for you”.

      I’m glad I’m not the only one who does this sort of thing. I also have to scold some junior colleagues about working on their weekends from time to time. Spending all your time working is just a recipe for loneliness and burnout - I know from experience so, try to nudge others away from it.

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’ll basically have timezones either way, there’s just two ways of doing it.

    If we all used UTC, then businesses would need to change what time they opened depending on their location. Ex: Best Buy opening at 12 noon on the US west coast, and 3pm on the east coast. Locations inbetween would have different opening times. So we would get the noon zone, 1pm zone, 2pm zone, and 3pm zone. All nation wide businesses with standard open/close times would effectively follow the same pattern, and it would be best if they all coordinated on where those zones occured. So then we would get new timezones, they’d just be slightly different in how they functioned.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, the main question is picking between:

      1. The time numbers are the same around the world, but schedules are shifted.
      2. The time numbers are shifted, but schedules are roughly the same.

      Personally I think 1 is more valuable because being able to easily and reliably talk about time seems more useful than being able to have my phone time show a number that lets me guess schedules when visiting a place.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      One big argument I keep hearing is that it would be too expensive.
      It’s honestly not that bad. The estimated cost is around $350 million. Now, that might sound like a lot but when you take into account that it’s about $1 per person it doesn’t seem so bad.
      Now, if you consider the military budget of $480 Billion per year it seems even smaller.
      It would take approximately 0.07% of the 2024 military budget to switch to metric.

      • Lemming421@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I imagine almost a bigger issue than the cost would be the… what’s the American equivalent of a Gammon?.. you know, those people that wouldn’t change to Metric if their life depended on it. Four rods to the hogshead was good enough for their grandpappy and no filthy pinko liberal commie will get them to change. The ones that still don’t wear seatbelts unless a cop is watching.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not cost, it’s just apathy. For most people it would take a while to learn, especially since after school you’re not really measuring that much in most jobs.

    • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      You could always start switching over then give up half way through. Then you’d be like your Grandpa England.

  • Demonmariner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    We do, it’s called Universal Coordinated Time. The time is now 00:37 UTC, or 16:37 Pacific Daylight Savings Time.

  • 121mhz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Pilots already do this. Everything in aviation is “ZULU” time. In computers, we call it UTC or +0000. It actually works really well because we cross time zones so easily.

    I would totally be in favor of switching to a universal time zone. But inertia is hard to overcome. Most people don’t change time zones very often as they’re usually far from population centers and people know that when they take a trip, that’s when the time zone will change so for most it’s not a daily concern and getting used to a new time zone model would be annoying. When you tell people about the US state of Indiana, they really start to change their minds, that place is fucked up.

    Hint: Reykjavik, Iceland is a major city that uses UTC always, no Daylight Savings Time there. I always keep my second time zone on my watch and phone set to that.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    People that proposes to replace local timezones with global UTC must be living in europe where it doesn’t impact them much if we do abolish the timezone. Now consider people that lives in the other side of the planet. Most people are active during the day, yet for them, the day will end right in the afternoon under the new system. So you tell your friend “hey, let’s meet tomorrow”, then your friend would be like “do you mean this afternoon, or in the morning next day?”. No way people living in the asia pacific would accept this without military intervension.

    • WhipperSnapper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think they mean concepts like morning and evening, or day and night would remain. The difference would be that in London, midnight would be 12:00am, but in San Fransisco, midnight would be… 16:00 / 4:00pm. Each timezone would have to adjust the numbers, in the same way the southern hemisphere considers January to be in the summer.

        • smo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s usually the case.

          I live and work on London time. If I want to have a phonecall with someone in the Philippines, I have to be mindful that 9am for me is 5pm for them, so I’ll need to make the effort to start early to catch them while they’re still at work.

          Without timezones: If I want to have a phonecall with someone in the Philippines, I have to be mindful that their working day is 1am to 9am, so I’ll need to make the effort to start early to catch them while they’re still at work.

          I’ll still need to lookup when their working day is, I’ll still have to adjust/account for it, and I’ll still have to get up early / start work early to make that call. Getting rid of timezones doesn’t get rid of that +8 or the affects of that +8, it just renames how we communicate it.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think the compromise would be the country/region that proposes global time should get the +12h offset. If the benefit really outweigh the pain for them, then they can deal with such a large offset themselves and spare the rest of the world from the brunt of the pain.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            12h offset is where it causes the maximum confusion to society because the date changes right in the middle of the day. In our personal and professional live, we never considered the date can change right in the middle of the day, causing wide variety of minor inconvenience in our daily life. Some examples of minor inconveniences:

            • Celebrating new year at noon. No more firework shows (could be good for the environment?).
            • Is today your friend’s birthday yet? Or is it in the afternoon?
            • should we celebrate christmas on 24th-25th or 25th-26th? Will Santa sneaks into our house at noon?
            • and possibly more minor inconveniences…
    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      must be living in europe

      This is a very dismissive argument. I live in a time zone where the day number would roll over during my waking day. But I still think that it would be better overall. (But not worth the switching costs.)

      “do you mean this afternoon, or in the morning next day?”

      It takes very little imagination to realize that this would not be an issue. “Tomorrow” would almost certainly be interpreted as roughly the next daylight period. This issue already exists as people are often up at midnight and somehow we don’t get confused when people say “I’ll see you tomorrow” at 23:55. We know that they don’t mean in 5min. This is just a source of jokes, but no one gets confused.

      The real issue would be things like “want to meet on wednesday” if there is a transition during working hours or “want to go out for dinner on the 17th” if the day transition happens near dinner time. I think this would be the hardest part to adapt to, but language is a flexible thing and I doubt it would take long for it to adapt.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I still think the people that would benefit the most from this change are europeans. They are mostly borderless and often works across the member countries than spans 7 timezones, centered roughly around the utc. It’s all benefits with very little downsides.

        It takes very little imagination to realize that this would not be an issue.

        There are a whole loads of minor annoyances related to this, most of them would vary depending on the local culture. In addition to that, not all countries are sufficiently globalized to realize the benefits of universal time, especially 3rd world countries. People living in those countries will experiences all the drawback with none of the benefits in their daily live.

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It takes very little imagination to realize that this would not be an issue. “Tomorrow” would almost certainly be interpreted as roughly the next daylight period.

        So when someone is doing this international meeting stuff they have to be very careful about saying “let’s look at this tomorrow” because in various places that can mean different things depending on when each person’s night is.

  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    For synchronizing of things like work and school we’d still end up with zones all using the same local hours (the day goes from 4:00 to 4:00 to e.g.) so we’d still end up with timezones there…

    All of the clocks around the world would read the same, sure, but now you have no idea what part of the day 4:00 is somewhere else. You’d end up doing almost the same math as we do now by offsetting their time from yours so you could understand it (4:00 is the same as my 13:00 for e.g. so it’s one hour past noon over there) but now we lose the shared understanding of which numbers correspond to which times of day. This means you’d be having to mentally convert all their new times of day to the clock time instead of having intuitive sense of their meaning.

    Instead of seeing the local time is 12:00 and immediately knowing it’s noon, now you’d look up what time their day started and see how many hours it’s been since then (12, so it’s noon there) and that offset is how you’d need to think of it and already what clocks show now…

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    It would make checking the meeting time a little easier, but make scheduling it way way harder. When scheduling a meeting I want to try to make it reasonable for everyone in the meeting and without time zones I’d have to look up a unique table of when daytime is for every location. That sounds so much worse to me than having a standardized time offset where reasonable working hours are pretty consistently defined. And the main time where I need to check time zones are at scheduling time anyways. When it comes to checking the meeting time everything I use already automatically converts the time to my local time.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Because it:

    • causes the question “What time is it there?” to be useless/unanswerable

    • necessitates significant changes to the way in which normal people talk about time

    • convolutes timetables, where present

    • means “days” are no longer the same as “days”

    • complicates both secular and religious law

    • is a staggering inconvenience for a minimum of five billion people

    • makes it near-impossible to reason about time in other parts of the world

    • does not mean everybody gets up at the same time, goes to work at the same time, or goes to bed at the same time

    • is not simpler at all

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      causes the question “What time is it there?” to be useless/unanswerable

      That is a feature, it removes one thing to worry about.

      necessitates significant changes to the way in which normal people talk about time

      Yes, I think this is the biggest argument against. It would take a long time to get used to.

      convolutes timetables, where present

      How?

      means “days” are no longer the same as “days”

      Same as point 2.

      complicates both secular and religious law

      How?

      is a staggering inconvenience for a minimum of five billion people

      How?

      makes it near-impossible to reason about time in other parts of the world

      How? In my opinion it makes it easier.

      does not mean everybody gets up at the same time, goes to work at the same time, or goes to bed at the same time

      Yes. This is true.

      is not simpler at all

      Of course it is simpler. You have just removed a huge source of complexity. It still isn’t simple because people will still live their life at different times. But it is simpler.

      • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        means “days” are no longer the same as “days”

        Who gets to pick when “noon” is when the sun is usually above their head? Let’s assume Greenwich for posterity sake. That means a bunch of the world will spend most of their “daytime” in traditionally nighttime hours. Thus spending your day (time when the sun is up) and your day (the time when you do your work) will not intuitively mean the same thing

        complicates both secular and religious law

        Islam requires regular prayer in the direction of mecca and plenty of nations have Islamic law. At a minimum they’d have to rewrite those laws, at most it’d cause a literal schism

        is a staggering inconvenience for a minimum of five billion people

        “We changed how clocks work for almost everyone on the planet to make some nerds’ lives easier. Please go change your planners, clocks, schedules, applications, signs, etc to adjust”

        makes it near-impossible to reason about time in other parts of the world

        In most of the world, you can reasonably assume the sun goes up around 7 am and sets around 7. Obviously that changes but you can pretty reasonably assume when people will be around and doing stuff by looking at their time. In this new system you’ll need to figure out what times people do most of their activities based off of geological segments of the planet and checking what their “daytime” is. Which is already a problem timezones address

        is not simpler at all

        On a base level maybe, but after fixing all the other problems it causes the resulting system would likely be just as if not more complicated than our current time system

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          That means a bunch of the world will spend most of their “daytime” in traditionally nighttime hours

          No, no one would do this. You would continue living your life when the sun is up, the number on the clock would just be different.

          Islam requires regular prayer in the direction of mecca and plenty of nations have Islamic law.

          So just continue doing this based on the previous schedule? Many religions still celebrate holidays based on alternate calendars and many holidays have strange rules for when they occur. This seems like an incredibly minor issue to me?

          We changed how clocks work

          Yeah, I agree that the change would be so painful that it isn’t worth it. I am just arguing that I think the end result would be better. Not much better, but better.

          you can pretty reasonably assume when people will be around and doing stuff by looking at their time

          This seems like a very artificial problem. When will you know their time previously but not their location or relative time of day. You will still know what people are doing. Just because you add the magic number based on their location in the world before consulting their schedule instead of after doesn’t change anything. This only seems like a problem if you were magically teleported to another location underground and only have access to a clock.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I am just arguing that I think the end result would be better. Not much better, but better.

            It would be better for whichever countries near the 0 offset (eu if using utc), but massive downgrade for no real benefit for countries near +12h offset (asia pacific). This will be seen as another instance of the west flexing their global power and will take generations to adapt. But if the offset were reversed (asia pacific at 0, the west at +12h) things would go much smoother there.

            • kevincox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think it would be better everywhere. It may be slightly easier if your noon is close to solar noon but really other than Europe and Africa everyone would be in the same boat of having the day number roll over sometime during their waking day. This would probably be the biggest downside but seems like something that language would adapt to quickly. I live at -5 so my day would roll over at 19:00 solar time. So it isn’t like my location is immune to the day rollover issue.

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Humans, generally, like to be awake when the sun is visible and asleep when it isn’t. The way we structure our thinking about time, morning, noon, evening, night, are based on the position of the sun.

    The single time zone thing sounds appealing until Germans have to be up at 2 AM to speak with their bosses in NYC as that’s a financial power center and thus gets to dictate the meeting times

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That is already the case in multinational companies. The problem of daytime here nighttime there but we need to meet is the same no matter what numbers their respective timepieces say.

      • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Perhaps the answer is to reform the concept of the meeting to exist in a far less useful way. Meetings should be a series of prerecorded messages sent via email and played like a correspondence game of Chess.

        This would be incredibly inefficient and annoying and perhaps be a catalyst to finally make the weekly update calls a goddamn email that just reads “nothing to report this week, still on schedule to meet Q2 goals” and I can finally get back to smoking weed and ignoring my work phone until 11 AM (sorry, 0635 Neo Standard Time) when I feel like making someone else more money than I’ll ever own.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The single time zone thing sounds appealing until Germans have to be up at 2 AM to speak with their bosses in NYC as that’s a financial power center and thus gets to dictate the meeting times.

      This is how it happens already with international companies, no?

      • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        It can be, yes, usually people attempt to be accommodating. I have a regular 8 AM meeting to collaborate with foreign colleagues for which it’s a 4 PM meeting. Neither of us are happy about it, but that’s compromise.

        I think a universal timezone would end up exacerbating the issue of some areas deferring to the ideal time of wealthier areas

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I see what you’re saying, about the awareness and consideration of other timezones that is encouraged simply by having individual ones.